3.3: Evidence of Evolution - Biology

3.3: Evidence of Evolution - Biology

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

The evidence for evolution is compelling and extensive. Looking at every level of organization in living systems, biologists see the signature of past and present evolution. Darwin dedicated a large portion of his book, On the Origin of Species, identifying patterns in nature that were consistent with evolution and since Darwin our understanding has become clearer and broader.


Fossils provide solid evidence that organisms from the past are not the same as those found today; fossils show a progression of evolution. Scientists determine the age of fossils and categorize them all over the world to determine when the organisms lived relative to each other. The resulting fossil record tells the story of the past, and shows the evolution of form over millions of years (Figure 11.3.1). For example, highly detailed fossil records have been recovered for sequences of species in the evolution of whales and modern horses. The fossil record of horses in North America is especially rich and many contain transition fossils: those showing intermediate anatomy between earlier and later forms. The fossil record extends back to a dog-like ancestor some 55 million years ago that gave rise to the first horse-like species 55 to 42 million years ago in the genus Eohippus. The series of fossils tracks the change in anatomy resulting from a gradual drying trend that changed the landscape from a forested one to a prairie. Successive fossils show the evolution of teeth shapes and foot and leg anatomy to a grazing habit, with adaptations for escaping predators, for example in species of Mesohippus found from 40 to 30 million years ago. Later species showed gains in size, such as those of Hipparion, which existed from about 23 to 2 million years ago. The fossil record shows several adaptive radiations in the horse lineage, which is now much reduced to only one genus, Equus, with several species.

Anatomy and Embryology

Another type of evidence for evolution is the presence of structures in organisms that share the same basic form. For example, the bones in the appendages of a human, dog, bird, and whale all share the same overall construction (Figure 11.3.2). That similarity results from their origin in the appendages of a common ancestor. Over time, evolution led to changes in the shapes and sizes of these bones in different species, but they have maintained the same overall layout, evidence of descent from a common ancestor. Scientists call these synonymous parts homologous structures. Some structures exist in organisms that have no apparent function at all, and appear to be residual parts from a past ancestor. For example, some snakes have pelvic bones despite having no legs because they descended from reptiles that did have legs. These unused structures without function are called vestigial structures. Other examples of vestigial structures are wings on flightless birds (which may have other functions), leaves on some cacti, traces of pelvic bones in whales, and the sightless eyes of cave animals.

Another evidence of evolution is the convergence of form in organisms that share similar environments. For example, species of unrelated animals, such as the arctic fox and ptarmigan (a bird), living in the arctic region have temporary white coverings during winter to blend with the snow and ice (Figure 11.3.3). The similarity occurs not because of common ancestry, indeed one covering is of fur and the other of feathers, but because of similar selection pressures—the benefits of not being seen by predators.

Embryology, the study of the development of the anatomy of an organism to its adult form also provides evidence of relatedness between now widely divergent groups of organisms. Structures that are absent in some groups often appear in their embryonic forms and disappear by the time the adult or juvenile form is reached. For example, all vertebrate embryos, including humans, exhibit gill slits at some point in their early development. These disappear in the adults of terrestrial groups, but are maintained in adult forms of aquatic groups such as fish and some amphibians. Great ape embryos, including humans, have a tail structure during their development that is lost by the time of birth. The reason embryos of unrelated species are often similar is that mutational changes that affect the organism during embryonic development can cause amplified differences in the adult, even while the embryonic similarities are preserved.


The geographic distribution of organisms on the planet follows patterns that are best explained by evolution in conjunction with the movement of tectonic plates over geological time. Broad groups that evolved before the breakup of the supercontinent Pangaea (about 200 million years ago) are distributed worldwide. Groups that evolved since the breakup appear uniquely in regions of the planet, for example the unique flora and fauna of northern continents that formed from the supercontinent Laurasia and of the southern continents that formed from the supercontinent Gondwana. The presence of Proteaceae in Australia, southern Africa, and South America is best explained by the plant family’s presence there prior to the southern supercontinent Gondwana breaking up (Figure 11.3.4).

The great diversification of the marsupials in Australia and the absence of other mammals reflects that island continent’s long isolation. Australia has an abundance of endemic species—species found nowhere else—which is typical of islands whose isolation by expanses of water prevents migration of species to other regions. Over time, these species diverge evolutionarily into new species that look very different from their ancestors that may exist on the mainland. The marsupials of Australia, the finches on the Galápagos, and many species on the Hawaiian Islands are all found nowhere else but on their island, yet display distant relationships to ancestral species on mainlands.

Molecular Biology

Like anatomical structures, the structures of the molecules of life reflect descent with modification. Evidence of a common ancestor for all of life is reflected in the universality of DNA as the genetic material and of the near universality of the genetic code and the machinery of DNA replication and expression. Fundamental divisions in life between the three domains are reflected in major structural differences in otherwise conservative structures such as the components of ribosomes and the structures of membranes. In general, the relatedness of groups of organisms is reflected in the similarity of their DNA sequences—exactly the pattern that would be expected from descent and diversification from a common ancestor.

DNA sequences have also shed light on some of the mechanisms of evolution. For example, it is clear that the evolution of new functions for proteins commonly occurs after gene duplication events. These duplications are a kind of mutation in which an entire gene is added as an extra copy (or many copies) in the genome. These duplications allow the free modification of one copy by mutation, selection, and drift, while the second copy continues to produce a functional protein. This allows the original function for the protein to be kept, while evolutionary forces tweak the copy until it functions in a new way.

Section Summary

The evidence for evolution is found at all levels of organization in living things and in the extinct species we know about through fossils. Fossils provide evidence for the evolutionary change through now extinct forms that led to modern species. For example, there is a rich fossil record that shows the evolutionary transitions from horse ancestors to modern horses that document intermediate forms and a gradual adaptation to changing ecosystems. The anatomy of species and the embryological development of that anatomy reveal common structures in divergent lineages that have been modified over time by evolution. The geographical distribution of living species reflects the origins of species in particular geographic locations and the history of continental movements. The structures of molecules, like anatomical structures, reflect the relationships of living species and match patterns of similarity expected from descent with modification.

Multiple Choice

The wing of a bird and the arm of a human are examples of ________.

A. vestigial structures
B. molecular structures
C. homologous structures
D. analogous structures


The fact that DNA sequences are more similar in more closely related organisms is evidence of what?

A. optimal design in organisms
B. adaptation
C. mutation
D. descent with modification


Free Response

Why do scientists consider vestigial structures evidence for evolution?

A vestigial structure is an example of a homologous structure that has apparently been reduced through evolution to a non-functional state because its function is no longer utilized by the species exhibiting it; therefore, any mutations which might reduce its structure are not selected against. The fact that the species has vestiges of the structure rather than no structure at all is evidence that it was present in an ancestor and evolved to non-functionality through accumulation of random mutations.


vestigial structure
a physical structure present in an organism but that has no apparent function and appears to be from a functional structure in a distant ancestor

Providing a definition of “evolution” is tricky because the word is used in different ways. First we need to distinguish between the broader worldview some associate with evolution and the scientific theory of evolution.

Some people consider evolution to be equivalent to atheism, thinking it replaces God or otherwise rules out God’s involvement in the development of life. But that is a philosophical or worldview position (sometimes called “evolutionism” or simply “naturalism”), not a strictly scientific position.

At BioLogos, we are against evolutionism and instead hold to the worldview of Christian theism. We call our position on origins “Evolutionary Creation.” That is to say, we believe God is the Creator and also accept that evolution is the best scientific description for how life has developed. This is similar to saying we believe God provides for the growth and development of plants while we also accept that the theory of photosynthesis is the best scientific explanation for that process.


Genetics Edit

One of the strongest evidences for common descent comes from gene sequences. Comparative sequence analysis examines the relationship between the DNA sequences of different species, [1] producing several lines of evidence that confirm Darwin's original hypothesis of common descent. If the hypothesis of common descent is true, then species that share a common ancestor inherited that ancestor's DNA sequence, as well as mutations unique to that ancestor. More closely related species have a greater fraction of identical sequence and shared substitutions compared to more distantly related species.

The simplest and most powerful evidence is provided by phylogenetic reconstruction. Such reconstructions, especially when done using slowly evolving protein sequences, are often quite robust and can be used to reconstruct a great deal of the evolutionary history of modern organisms (and even in some instances of the evolutionary history of extinct organisms, such as the recovered gene sequences of mammoths or Neanderthals). These reconstructed phylogenies recapitulate the relationships established through morphological and biochemical studies. [2] The most detailed reconstructions have been performed on the basis of the mitochondrial genomes shared by all eukaryotic organisms, [3] which are short and easy to sequence the broadest reconstructions have been performed either using the sequences of a few very ancient proteins or by using ribosomal RNA sequence. [ citation needed ]

Phylogenetic relationships extend to a wide variety of nonfunctional sequence elements, including repeats, transposons, pseudogenes, and mutations in protein-coding sequences that do not change the amino-acid sequence. While a minority of these elements might later be found to harbor function, in aggregate they demonstrate that identity must be the product of common descent rather than common function. [4]

Universal biochemical organisation and molecular variance patterns Edit

All known extant (surviving) organisms are based on the same biochemical processes: genetic information encoded as nucleic acid (DNA, or RNA for many viruses), transcribed into RNA, then translated into proteins (that is, polymers of amino acids) by highly conserved ribosomes. Perhaps most tellingly, the Genetic Code (the "translation table" between DNA and amino acids) is the same for almost every organism, meaning that a piece of DNA in a bacterium codes for the same amino acid as in a human cell. ATP is used as energy currency by all extant life. A deeper understanding of developmental biology shows that common morphology is, in fact, the product of shared genetic elements. [5] For example, although camera-like eyes are believed to have evolved independently on many separate occasions, [6] they share a common set of light-sensing proteins (opsins), suggesting a common point of origin for all sighted creatures. [7] [8] Another example is the familiar vertebrate body plan, whose structure is controlled by the homeobox (Hox) family of genes. [9]

DNA sequencing Edit

Comparison of DNA sequences allows organisms to be grouped by sequence similarity, and the resulting phylogenetic trees are typically congruent with traditional taxonomy, and are often used to strengthen or correct taxonomic classifications. Sequence comparison is considered a measure robust enough to correct erroneous assumptions in the phylogenetic tree in instances where other evidence is scarce. For example, neutral human DNA sequences are approximately 1.2% divergent (based on substitutions) from those of their nearest genetic relative, the chimpanzee, 1.6% from gorillas, and 6.6% from baboons. [10] [11] Genetic sequence evidence thus allows inference and quantification of genetic relatedness between humans and other apes. [12] [13] The sequence of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, a vital gene encoding a part of the ribosome, was used to find the broad phylogenetic relationships between all extant life. The analysis by Carl Woese resulted in the three-domain system, arguing for two major splits in the early evolution of life. The first split led to modern Bacteria and the subsequent split led to modern Archaea and Eukaryotes. [14] [15]

Some DNA sequences are shared by very different organisms. It has been predicted by the theory of evolution that the differences in such DNA sequences between two organisms should roughly resemble both the biological difference between them according to their anatomy and the time that had passed since these two organisms have separated in the course of evolution, as seen in fossil evidence. The rate of accumulating such changes should be low for some sequences, namely those that code for critical RNA or proteins, and high for others that code for less critical RNA or proteins but for every specific sequence, the rate of change should be roughly constant over time. These results have been experimentally confirmed. Two examples are DNA sequences coding for rRNA, which is highly conserved, and DNA sequences coding for fibrinopeptides, amino acid chains discarded during the formation of fibrin, which are highly non-conserved. [16]

Proteins Edit

Proteomic evidence also supports the universal ancestry of life. Vital proteins, such as the ribosome, DNA polymerase, and RNA polymerase, are found in everything from the most primitive bacteria to the most complex mammals. The core part of the protein is conserved across all lineages of life, serving similar functions. Higher organisms have evolved additional protein subunits, largely affecting the regulation and protein-protein interaction of the core. Other overarching similarities between all lineages of extant organisms, such as DNA, RNA, amino acids, and the lipid bilayer, give support to the theory of common descent. Phylogenetic analyses of protein sequences from various organisms produce similar trees of relationship between all organisms. [17] The chirality of DNA, RNA, and amino acids is conserved across all known life. As there is no functional advantage to right- or left-handed molecular chirality, the simplest hypothesis is that the choice was made randomly by early organisms and passed on to all extant life through common descent. Further evidence for reconstructing ancestral lineages comes from junk DNA such as pseudogenes, "dead" genes that steadily accumulate mutations. [18]

Pseudogenes Edit

Pseudogenes, also known as noncoding DNA, are extra DNA in a genome that do not get transcribed into RNA to synthesize proteins. Some of this noncoding DNA has known functions, but much of it has no known function and is called "Junk DNA". [19] [20] [21] [22] This is an example of a vestige since replicating these genes uses energy, making it a waste in many cases. A pseudogene can be produced when a coding gene accumulates mutations that prevent it from being transcribed, making it non-functional. [19] But since it is not transcribed, it may disappear without affecting fitness, unless it has provided some beneficial function as non-coding DNA. Non-functional pseudogenes may be passed on to later species, thereby labeling the later species as descended from the earlier species. [ citation needed ]

Other mechanisms Edit

A large body of molecular evidence supports a variety of mechanisms for large evolutionary changes, including: genome and gene duplication, which facilitates rapid evolution by providing substantial quantities of genetic material under weak or no selective constraints horizontal gene transfer, the process of transferring genetic material to another cell that is not an organism's offspring, allowing for species to acquire beneficial genes from each other and recombination, capable of reassorting large numbers of different alleles and of establishing reproductive isolation. The endosymbiotic theory explains the origin of mitochondria and plastids (including chloroplasts), which are organelles of eukaryotic cells, as the incorporation of an ancient prokaryotic cell into ancient eukaryotic cell. Rather than evolving eukaryotic organelles slowly, this theory offers a mechanism for a sudden evolutionary leap by incorporating the genetic material and biochemical composition of a separate species. Evidence supporting this mechanism has been found in the protist Hatena: as a predator it engulfs a green algal cell, which subsequently behaves as an endosymbiont, nourishing Hatena, which in turn loses its feeding apparatus and behaves as an autotroph. [23] [24]

Since metabolic processes do not leave fossils, research into the evolution of the basic cellular processes is done largely by comparison of existing organisms. Many lineages diverged when new metabolic processes appeared, and it is theoretically possible to determine when certain metabolic processes appeared by comparing the traits of the descendants of a common ancestor or by detecting their physical manifestations. As an example, the appearance of oxygen in the earth's atmosphere is linked to the evolution of photosynthesis. [ original research? ] [ citation needed ]

Specific examples from comparative physiology and biochemistry Edit

Chromosome 2 in humans Edit

Evidence for the evolution of Homo sapiens from a common ancestor with chimpanzees is found in the number of chromosomes in humans as compared to all other members of Hominidae. All hominidae have 24 pairs of chromosomes, except humans, who have only 23 pairs. Human chromosome 2 is a result of an end-to-end fusion of two ancestral chromosomes. [25] [26]

The evidence for this includes:

  • The correspondence of chromosome 2 to two ape chromosomes. The closest human relative, the chimpanzee, has near-identical DNA sequences to human chromosome 2, but they are found in two separate chromosomes. The same is true of the more distant gorilla and orangutan. [27][28]
  • The presence of a vestigialcentromere. Normally a chromosome has just one centromere, but in chromosome 2 there are remnants of a second centromere. [29]
  • The presence of vestigial telomeres. These are normally found only at the ends of a chromosome, but in chromosome 2 there are additional telomere sequences in the middle. [30]

Chromosome 2 thus presents strong evidence in favour of the common descent of humans and other apes. According to J. W. Ijdo, "We conclude that the locus cloned in cosmids c8.1 and c29B is the relic of an ancient telomere-telomere fusion and marks the point at which two ancestral ape chromosomes fused to give rise to human chromosome 2." [30]

Cytochrome c and b Edit

A classic example of biochemical evidence for evolution is the variance of the ubiquitous (i.e. all living organisms have it, because it performs very basic life functions) protein Cytochrome c in living cells. The variance of cytochrome c of different organisms is measured in the number of differing amino acids, each differing amino acid being a result of a base pair substitution, a mutation. If each differing amino acid is assumed the result of one base pair substitution, it can be calculated how long ago the two species diverged by multiplying the number of base pair substitutions by the estimated time it takes for a substituted base pair of the cytochrome c gene to be successfully passed on. For example, if the average time it takes for a base pair of the cytochrome c gene to mutate is N years, the number of amino acids making up the cytochrome c protein in monkeys differ by one from that of humans, this leads to the conclusion that the two species diverged N years ago.

The primary structure of cytochrome c consists of a chain of about 100 amino acids. Many higher order organisms possess a chain of 104 amino acids. [31]

The cytochrome c molecule has been extensively studied for the glimpse it gives into evolutionary biology. Both chicken and turkeys have identical sequence homology (amino acid for amino acid), as do pigs, cows and sheep. Both humans and chimpanzees share the identical molecule, while rhesus monkeys share all but one of the amino acids: [32] the 66th amino acid is isoleucine in the former and threonine in the latter. [31]

What makes these homologous similarities particularly suggestive of common ancestry in the case of cytochrome c, in addition to the fact that the phylogenies derived from them match other phylogenies very well, is the high degree of functional redundancy of the cytochrome c molecule. The different existing configurations of amino acids do not significantly affect the functionality of the protein, which indicates that the base pair substitutions are not part of a directed design, but the result of random mutations that aren't subject to selection. [33]

In addition, Cytochrome b is commonly used as a region of mitochondrial DNA to determine phylogenetic relationships between organisms due to its sequence variability. It is considered most useful in determining relationships within families and genera. Comparative studies involving cytochrome b have resulted in new classification schemes and have been used to assign newly described species to a genus, as well as deepen the understanding of evolutionary relationships. [34]

Endogenous retroviruses Edit

Endogenous retroviruses (or ERVs) are remnant sequences in the genome left from ancient viral infections in an organism. The retroviruses (or virogenes) are always passed on to the next generation of that organism that received the infection. This leaves the virogene left in the genome. Because this event is rare and random, finding identical chromosomal positions of a virogene in two different species suggests common ancestry. [33] Cats (Felidae) present a notable instance of virogene sequences demonstrating common descent. The standard phylogenetic tree for Felidae have smaller cats (Felis chaus, Felis silvestris, Felis nigripes, and Felis catus) diverging from larger cats such as the subfamily Pantherinae and other carnivores. The fact that small cats have an ERV where the larger cats do not suggests that the gene was inserted into the ancestor of the small cats after the larger cats had diverged. [35] Another example of this is with humans and chimps. Humans contain numerous ERVs that comprise a considerable percentage of the genome. Sources vary, but 1% [36] to 8% [37] has been proposed. Humans and chimps share seven different occurrences of virogenes, while all primates share similar retroviruses congruent with phylogeny. [38] [39]

Recent African origin of modern humans Edit

Mathematical models of evolution, pioneered by the likes of Sewall Wright, Ronald Fisher and J. B. S. Haldane and extended via diffusion theory by Motoo Kimura, allow predictions about the genetic structure of evolving populations. Direct examination of the genetic structure of modern populations via DNA sequencing has allowed verification of many of these predictions. For example, the Out of Africa theory of human origins, which states that modern humans developed in Africa and a small sub-population migrated out (undergoing a population bottleneck), implies that modern populations should show the signatures of this migration pattern. Specifically, post-bottleneck populations (Europeans and Asians) should show lower overall genetic diversity and a more uniform distribution of allele frequencies compared to the African population. Both of these predictions are borne out by actual data from a number of studies. [40]

Comparative study of the anatomy of groups of animals or plants reveals that certain structural features are basically similar. For example, the basic structure of all flowers consists of sepals, petals, stigma, style and ovary yet the size, colour, number of parts and specific structure are different for each individual species. The neural anatomy of fossilized remains may also be compared using advanced imaging techniques. [41]

Atavisms Edit

Once thought of as a refutation to evolutionary theory, atavisms are "now seen as potent evidence of how much genetic potential is retained. after a particular structure has disappeared from a species". [43] "Atavisms are the reappearance of a lost character typical of remote ancestors and not seen in the parents or recent ancestors. " [44] and are an "[indication] of the developmental plasticity that exists within embryos. " [44] Atavisms occur because genes for previously existing phenotypical features are often preserved in DNA, even though the genes are not expressed in some or most of the organisms possessing them. [45] Numerous examples have documented the occurrence of atavisms alongside experimental research triggering their formation. Due to the complexity and interrelatedness of the factors involved in the development of atavisms, both biologists and medical professionals find it "difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish [them] from malformations." [46]

Some examples of atavisms found in the scientific literature include:

  • Hind limbs in whales. [44] (see figure 2a)
  • Reappearance of limbs in limbless vertebrates. [43][44][47]
  • Back pair of flippers on a bottlenose dolphin. [48]
  • Extra toes of the modern horse. [44][49][50] (not pseudo-tails) [46][51] and extra nipples in humans. [44]
  • Re-evolution of sexuality from parthenogenesis in orbitid mites. [52]
  • Teeth in chickens. [53] in dogs. [44]
  • Reappearance of wings on wingless stick insects [54] and earwigs. [44]
  • Atavistic muscles in several birds [55][56] and mammals such as the beagle[57] and the jerboa. [55]
  • Extra toes in guinea pigs. [44][58]

Evolutionary developmental biology and embryonic development Edit

Evolutionary developmental biology is the biological field that compares the developmental process of different organisms to determine ancestral relationships between species. A large variety of organism's genomes contain a small fraction of genes that control the organisms development. Hox genes are an example of these types of nearly universal genes in organisms pointing to an origin of common ancestry. Embryological evidence comes from the development of organisms at the embryological level with the comparison of different organisms embryos similarity. Remains of ancestral traits often appear and disappear in different stages of the embryological development process.

  • Hair growth and loss (lanugo) during human development. [59]
  • Development and degeneration of a yolk sac.
  • Terrestrial frogs and salamanders passing through the larval stage within the egg—with features of typically aquatic larvae—but hatch ready for life on land [60]
  • The appearance of gill-like structures (pharyngeal arch) in vertebrate embryo development. Note that in fish, the arches continue to develop as branchial arches while in humans, for example, they give rise to a variety of structures within the head and neck.

Homologous structures and divergent (adaptive) evolution Edit

If widely separated groups of organisms are originated from a common ancestry, they are expected to have certain basic features in common. The degree of resemblance between two organisms should indicate how closely related they are in evolution:

  • Groups with little in common are assumed to have diverged from a common ancestor much earlier in geological history than groups with a lot in common
  • In deciding how closely related two animals are, a comparative anatomist looks for structures that are fundamentally similar, even though they may serve different functions in the adult. Such structures are described as homologous and suggest a common origin.
  • In cases where the similar structures serve different functions in adults, it may be necessary to trace their origin and embryonic development. A similar developmental origin suggests they are the same structure, and thus likely derived from a common ancestor.

When a group of organisms share a homologous structure that is specialized to perform a variety of functions to adapt different environmental conditions and modes of life, it is called adaptive radiation. The gradual spreading of organisms with adaptive radiation is known as divergent evolution.

Nested hierarchies and classification Edit

Taxonomy is based on the fact that all organisms are related to each other in nested hierarchies based on shared characteristics. Most existing species can be organized rather easily in a nested hierarchical classification. This is evident from the Linnaean classification scheme. Based on shared derived characters, closely related organisms can be placed in one group (such as a genus), several genera can be grouped together into one family, several families can be grouped together into an order, etc. [61] The existence of these nested hierarchies was recognized by many biologists before Darwin, but he showed that his theory of evolution with its branching pattern of common descent could explain them. [61] [62] Darwin described how common descent could provide a logical basis for classification: [63]

All the foregoing rules and aids and difficulties in classification are explained, if I do not greatly deceive myself, on the view that the natural system is founded on descent with modification that the characters which naturalists consider as showing true affinity between any two or more species, are those which have been inherited from a common parent, and, in so far, all true classification is genealogical that community of descent is the hidden bond which naturalists have been unconsciously seeking, .

Evolutionary trees Edit

An evolutionary tree (of Amniota, for example, the last common ancestor of mammals and reptiles, and all its descendants) illustrates the initial conditions causing evolutionary patterns of similarity (e.g., all Amniotes produce an egg that possesses the amnios) and the patterns of divergence amongst lineages (e.g., mammals and reptiles branching from the common ancestry in Amniota). Evolutionary trees provide conceptual models of evolving systems once thought limited in the domain of making predictions out of the theory. [64] However, the method of phylogenetic bracketing is used to infer predictions with far greater probability than raw speculation. For example, paleontologists use this technique to make predictions about nonpreservable traits in fossil organisms, such as feathered dinosaurs, and molecular biologists use the technique to posit predictions about RNA metabolism and protein functions. [65] [66] Thus evolutionary trees are evolutionary hypotheses that refer to specific facts, such as the characteristics of organisms (e.g., scales, feathers, fur), providing evidence for the patterns of descent, and a causal explanation for modification (i.e., natural selection or neutral drift) in any given lineage (e.g., Amniota). Evolutionary biologists test evolutionary theory using phylogenetic systematic methods that measure how much the hypothesis (a particular branching pattern in an evolutionary tree) increases the likelihood of the evidence (the distribution of characters among lineages). [67] [68] [69] The severity of tests for a theory increases if the predictions "are the least probable of being observed if the causal event did not occur." [70] "Testability is a measure of how much the hypothesis increases the likelihood of the evidence." [71]

Vestigial structures Edit

Evidence for common descent comes from the existence of vestigial structures. [72] These rudimentary structures are often homologous to structures that correspond in related or ancestral species. A wide range of structures exist such as mutated and non-functioning genes, parts of a flower, muscles, organs, and even behaviors. This variety can be found across many different groups of species. In many cases they are degenerated or underdeveloped. The existence of vestigial organs can be explained in terms of changes in the environment or modes of life of the species. Those organs are typically functional in the ancestral species but are now either semi-functional, nonfunctional, or re-purposed.

Scientific literature concerning vestigial structures abounds. One study compiled 64 examples of vestigial structures found in the literature across a wide range of disciplines within the 21st century. [73] The following non-exhaustive list summarizes Senter et al. alongside various other examples:

  • The presence of remnant mitochondria (mitosomes) that have lost the ability to synthesize ATP in Entamoeba histolytica, Trachipleistophora hominis, Cryptosporidium parvum, Blastocystis hominis, and Giardia intestinalis. [74]
  • Remnant chloroplast organelles (leucoplasts) in non-photosynthetic algae species (Plasmodium falciparum, Toxoplasma gondii, Aspasia longa, Anthophysa vegetans, Ciliophrys infusionum, Pteridomonas danica, Paraphysomonas, Spumella and Epifagus americana. [75]
  • Missing stamens (unvascularized staminodes) on Gilliesia and Gethyum flowers. [76]
  • Non-functioning androecium in female flowers and non-functioning gynoecium in male flowers of the cactus species Consolea spinosissima. [77]
  • Remnant stamens on female flowers of Fragaria virginiana [78] all species in the genus Schiedea [79] and on Penstemon centranthifolius, P. rostriflorus, P. ellipticus, and P. palmeri. [80]
  • Vestigial anthers on Nemophila menziesii. [81]
  • Reduced hindlimbs and pelvic girdle embedded in the muscles of extant whales (see figure 2b). [82][83][84][85] Occasionally, the genes that code for longer extremities cause a modern whale to develop legs. On 28 October 2006, a four-finned bottlenose dolphin was caught and studied due to its extra set of hind limbs. [86] These legged Cetacea display an example of an atavism predicted from their common ancestry.
  • Nonfunctional hind wings in Carabus solieri[87] and other beetles. [83]
  • Remnant eyes (and eye structures) in animals that have lost sight such as blind cavefish (e.g. Astyanax mexicanus), [88] mole rats, snakes, spiders, salamanders, shrimp, crayfish, and beetles. [89][90]
  • Vestigial eye in the extant Rhineura floridana and remnant jugal in the extinct Rhineura hatchery (reclassified as Protorhineura hatcherii). [91][92]
  • Functionless wings in flightless birds such as ostriches, kiwis, cassowaries, and emus. [93][94]
  • The presence of the plica semilunaris in the human eye—a vestigial remnant of the nictitating membrane. [95] in primates. [96]
  • Reduced hind limbs and pelvic girdle structures in legless lizards, skinks, [97]amphisbaenians, and some snakes. [98][99]
  • Reduced and missing olfactory apparatus in whales that still possess vestigial olfactory receptor subgenomes. [100]
  • Vestigial teeth in narwhal. [101]
  • Rudimentary digits of Ateles geoffroyi, Colobus guereza, and Perodicticus potto. [102]
  • Vestigial dental primordia in the embryonic tooth pattern in mice. [103]
  • Reduced or absent vomeronasal organ in humans and Old World monkeys. [104][105]
  • Presence of non-functional sinus hair muscles in humans used in whisker movement. [106]
  • Degenerating palmaris longus muscle in humans. [107] , anthropoid primates (Simians), guinea pigs, some bat species, and some Passeriformes have lost the ability to synthesize vitamin C (ascorbic acid), yet still possess the genes involved. This inability is due to mutations of the L-gulono-γ-lactone oxidase (GLO) gene— and in primates, teleost fish, and guinea pigs it is irreversible. [108]
  • Remnant abdominal segments in cirripedes (barnacles). [109]
  • Non-mammalian vertebrate embryos depend on nutrients from the yolk sac. Humans and other mammal genomes contain broken, non-functioning genes that code for the production of yolk. alongside the presence of an empty yolk sac with the embryo. [110][111][112]
  • Dolphin embryonic limb buds. [113]
  • Leaf formation in some cacti species. [114]
  • Presence of a vestigial endosymbiont Lepidodinium viride within the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium chlorophorum. [115]
  • The species Dolabrifera dolabrifera has an ink gland but is "incapable of producing ink or its associated anti-predator proteins". [116]

Specific examples from comparative anatomy Edit

Insect mouthparts and appendages Edit

Many different species of insects have mouthparts derived from the same embryonic structures, indicating that the mouthparts are modifications of a common ancestor's original features. These include a labrum (upper lip), a pair of mandibles, a hypopharynx (floor of mouth), a pair of maxillae, and a labium. (Fig. 2c) Evolution has caused enlargement and modification of these structures in some species, while it has caused the reduction and loss of them in other species. The modifications enable the insects to exploit a variety of food materials.

Insect mouthparts and antennae are considered homologues of insect legs. Parallel developments are seen in some arachnids: The anterior pair of legs may be modified as analogues of antennae, particularly in whip scorpions, which walk on six legs. These developments provide support for the theory that complex modifications often arise by duplication of components, with the duplicates modified in different directions.

Pelvic structure of dinosaurs Edit

Similar to the pentadactyl limb in mammals, the earliest dinosaurs split into two distinct orders—the saurischia and ornithischia. They are classified as one or the other in accordance with what the fossils demonstrate. Figure 2d, shows that early saurischians resembled early ornithischians. The pattern of the pelvis in all species of dinosaurs is an example of homologous structures. Each order of dinosaur has slightly differing pelvis bones providing evidence of common descent. Additionally, modern birds show a similarity to ancient saurischian pelvic structures indicating the evolution of birds from dinosaurs. This can also be seen in Figure 5c as the Aves branch off the Theropoda suborder.

Pentadactyl limb Edit

The pattern of limb bones called pentadactyl limb is an example of homologous structures (Fig. 2e). It is found in all classes of tetrapods (i.e. from amphibians to mammals). It can even be traced back to the fins of certain fossil fishes from which the first amphibians evolved such as tiktaalik. The limb has a single proximal bone (humerus), two distal bones (radius and ulna), a series of carpals (wrist bones), followed by five series of metacarpals (palm bones) and phalanges (digits). Throughout the tetrapods, the fundamental structures of pentadactyl limbs are the same, indicating that they originated from a common ancestor. But in the course of evolution, these fundamental structures have been modified. They have become superficially different and unrelated structures to serve different functions in adaptation to different environments and modes of life. This phenomenon is shown in the forelimbs of mammals. For example:

  • In monkeys, the forelimbs are much elongated, forming a grasping hand used for climbing and swinging among trees. have lost their first digit, while the second and fifth digits are reduced. The remaining two digits are longer and stouter than the rest and bear a hoof for supporting the body.
  • In horses, the forelimbs are highly adapted for strength and support. Fast and long-distance running is possible due to the extensive elongation of the third digit that bears a hoof.
  • The mole has a pair of short, spade-like forelimbs for burrowing. use their enlarged third digit for tearing into ant and termite nests.
  • In cetaceans, the forelimbs become flippers for steering and maintaining equilibrium during swimming.
  • In bats, the forelimbs have become highly modified and evolved into functioning wings. Four digits have become elongated, while the hook-like first digit remains free and is used to grip.

Recurrent laryngeal nerve in giraffes Edit

The recurrent laryngeal nerve is a fourth branch of the vagus nerve, which is a cranial nerve. In mammals, its path is unusually long. As a part of the vagus nerve, it comes from the brain, passes through the neck down to heart, rounds the dorsal aorta and returns up to the larynx, again through the neck. (Fig. 2f)

This path is suboptimal even for humans, but for giraffes it becomes even more suboptimal. Due to the lengths of their necks, the recurrent laryngeal nerve may be up to 4 m (13 ft) long, despite its optimal route being a distance of just several inches.

The indirect route of this nerve is the result of evolution of mammals from fish, which had no neck and had a relatively short nerve that innervated one gill slit and passed near the gill arch. Since then, the gill it innervated has become the larynx and the gill arch has become the dorsal aorta in mammals. [117] [118]

Route of the vas deferens Edit

Similar to the laryngeal nerve in giraffes, the vas deferens is part of the male anatomy of many vertebrates it transports sperm from the epididymis in anticipation of ejaculation. In humans, the vas deferens routes up from the testicle, looping over the ureter, and back down to the urethra and penis. It has been suggested that this is due to the descent of the testicles during the course of human evolution—likely associated with temperature. As the testicles descended, the vas deferens lengthened to accommodate the accidental "hook" over the ureter. [118] [119]

When organisms die, they often decompose rapidly or are consumed by scavengers, leaving no permanent evidences of their existence. However, occasionally, some organisms are preserved. The remains or traces of organisms from a past geologic age embedded in rocks by natural processes are called fossils. They are extremely important for understanding the evolutionary history of life on Earth, as they provide direct evidence of evolution and detailed information on the ancestry of organisms. Paleontology is the study of past life based on fossil records and their relations to different geologic time periods.

For fossilization to take place, the traces and remains of organisms must be quickly buried so that weathering and decomposition do not occur. Skeletal structures or other hard parts of the organisms are the most commonly occurring form of fossilized remains. There are also some trace "fossils" showing moulds, cast or imprints of some previous organisms.

As an animal dies, the organic materials gradually decay, such that the bones become porous. If the animal is subsequently buried in mud, mineral salts infiltrate into the bones and gradually fill up the pores. The bones harden into stones and are preserved as fossils. This process is known as petrification. If dead animals are covered by wind-blown sand, and if the sand is subsequently turned into mud by heavy rain or floods, the same process of mineral infiltration may occur. Apart from petrification, the dead bodies of organisms may be well preserved in ice, in hardened resin of coniferous trees (figure 3a), in tar, or in anaerobic, acidic peat. Fossilization can sometimes be a trace, an impression of a form. Examples include leaves and footprints, the fossils of which are made in layers that then harden.

Fossil record Edit

It is possible to decipher how a particular group of organisms evolved by arranging its fossil record in a chronological sequence. Such a sequence can be determined because fossils are mainly found in sedimentary rock. Sedimentary rock is formed by layers of silt or mud on top of each other thus, the resulting rock contains a series of horizontal layers, or strata. Each layer contains fossils typical for a specific time period when they formed. The lowest strata contain the oldest rock and the earliest fossils, while the highest strata contain the youngest rock and more recent fossils.

A succession of animals and plants can also be seen from fossil discoveries. By studying the number and complexity of different fossils at different stratigraphic levels, it has been shown that older fossil-bearing rocks contain fewer types of fossilized organisms, and they all have a simpler structure, whereas younger rocks contain a greater variety of fossils, often with increasingly complex structures. [121]

For many years, geologists could only roughly estimate the ages of various strata and the fossils found. They did so, for instance, by estimating the time for the formation of sedimentary rock layer by layer. Today, by measuring the proportions of radioactive and stable elements in a given rock, the ages of fossils can be more precisely dated by scientists. This technique is known as radiometric dating.

Throughout the fossil record, many species that appear at an early stratigraphic level disappear at a later level. This is interpreted in evolutionary terms as indicating the times when species originated and became extinct. Geographical regions and climatic conditions have varied throughout Earth's history. Since organisms are adapted to particular environments, the constantly changing conditions favoured species that adapted to new environments through the mechanism of natural selection.

Extent of the fossil record Edit

Despite the relative rarity of suitable conditions for fossilization, an estimated 250,000 fossil species have been named. [122] The number of individual fossils this represents varies greatly from species to species, but many millions of fossils have been recovered: for instance, more than three million fossils from the last ice age have been recovered from the La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles. [123] Many more fossils are still in the ground, in various geological formations known to contain a high fossil density, allowing estimates of the total fossil content of the formation to be made. An example of this occurs in South Africa's Beaufort Formation (part of the Karoo Supergroup, which covers most of South Africa), which is rich in vertebrate fossils, including therapsids (reptile-mammal transitional forms). [124] It has been estimated that this formation contains 800 billion vertebrate fossils. [125] Palentologists have documented numerous transitional forms and have constructed "an astonishingly comprehensive record of the key transitions in animal evolution". [126] Conducting a survey of the paleontological literature, one would find that there is "abundant evidence for how all the major groups of animals are related, much of it in the form of excellent transitional fossils". [126]

Limitations Edit

The fossil record is an important source for scientists when tracing the evolutionary history of organisms. However, because of limitations inherent in the record, there are not fine scales of intermediate forms between related groups of species. This lack of continuous fossils in the record is a major limitation in tracing the descent of biological groups. When transitional fossils are found that show intermediate forms in what had previously been a gap in knowledge, they are often popularly referred to as "missing links".

There is a gap of about 100 million years between the beginning of the Cambrian period and the end of the Ordovician period. The early Cambrian period was the period from which numerous fossils of sponges, cnidarians (e.g., jellyfish), echinoderms (e.g., eocrinoids), molluscs (e.g., snails) and arthropods (e.g., trilobites) are found. The first animal that possessed the typical features of vertebrates, the Arandaspis, was dated to have existed in the later Ordovician period. Thus few, if any, fossils of an intermediate type between invertebrates and vertebrates have been found, although likely candidates include the Burgess Shale animal, Pikaia gracilens, [127] and its Maotianshan shales relatives, Myllokunmingia, Yunnanozoon, Haikouella lanceolata, [128] and Haikouichthys. [129]

Some of the reasons for the incompleteness of fossil records are:

  • In general, the probability that an organism becomes fossilized is very low
  • Some species or groups are less likely to become fossils because they are soft-bodied
  • Some species or groups are less likely to become fossils because they live (and die) in conditions that are not favourable for fossilization
  • Many fossils have been destroyed through erosion and tectonic movements
  • Most fossils are fragmentary
  • Some evolutionary change occurs in populations at the limits of a species' ecological range, and as these populations are likely small, the probability of fossilization is lower (see punctuated equilibrium)
  • Similarly, when environmental conditions change, the population of a species is likely to be greatly reduced, such that any evolutionary change induced by these new conditions is less likely to be fossilized
  • Most fossils convey information about external form, but little about how the organism functioned
  • Using present-day biodiversity as a guide, this suggests that the fossils unearthed represent only a small fraction of the large number of species of organisms that lived in the past.

Specific examples from paleontology Edit

Evolution of the horse Edit

Due to an almost-complete fossil record found in North American sedimentary deposits from the early Eocene to the present, the horse provides one of the best examples of evolutionary history (phylogeny).

This evolutionary sequence starts with a small animal called Hyracotherium (commonly referred to as Eohippus), which lived in North America about 54 million years ago then spread across to Europe and Asia. Fossil remains of Hyracotherium show it to have differed from the modern horse in three important respects: it was a small animal (the size of a fox), lightly built and adapted for running the limbs were short and slender, and the feet elongated so that the digits were almost vertical, with four digits in the forelimbs and three digits in the hindlimbs and the incisors were small, the molars having low crowns with rounded cusps covered in enamel. [130]

The probable course of development of horses from Hyracotherium to Equus (the modern horse) involved at least 12 genera and several hundred species. The major trends seen in the development of the horse to changing environmental conditions may be summarized as follows:

  • Increase in size (from 0.4 m to 1.5 m — from 15 in to 60 in)
  • Lengthening of limbs and feet
  • Reduction of lateral digits
  • Increase in length and thickness of the third digit
  • Increase in width of incisors
  • Replacement of premolars by molars and
  • Increases in tooth length, crown height of molars.

Fossilized plants found in different strata show that the marshy, wooded country in which Hyracotherium lived became gradually drier. Survival now depended on the head being in an elevated position for gaining a good view of the surrounding countryside, and on a high turn of speed for escape from predators, hence the increase in size and the replacement of the splayed-out foot by the hoofed foot. The drier, harder ground would make the original splayed-out foot unnecessary for support. The changes in the teeth can be explained by assuming that the diet changed from soft vegetation to grass. A dominant genus from each geological period has been selected (see figure 3e) to show the slow alteration of the horse lineage from its ancestral to its modern form. [131]

Transition from fish to amphibians Edit

Prior to 2004, paleontologists had found fossils of amphibians with necks, ears, and four legs, in rock no older than 365 million years old. In rocks more than 385 million years old they could only find fish, without these amphibian characteristics. Evolutionary theory predicted that since amphibians evolved from fish, an intermediate form should be found in rock dated between 365 and 385 million years ago. Such an intermediate form should have many fish-like characteristics, conserved from 385 million years ago or more, but also have many amphibian characteristics as well. In 2004, an expedition to islands in the Canadian arctic searching specifically for this fossil form in rocks that were 375 million years old discovered fossils of Tiktaalik. [132] Some years later, however, scientists in Poland found evidence of fossilised tetrapod tracks predating Tiktaalik. [133]

Data about the presence or absence of species on various continents and islands (biogeography) can provide evidence of common descent and shed light on patterns of speciation.

Continental distribution Edit

All organisms are adapted to their environment to a greater or lesser extent. If the abiotic and biotic factors within a habitat are capable of supporting a particular species in one geographic area, then one might assume that the same species would be found in a similar habitat in a similar geographic area, e.g. in Africa and South America. This is not the case. Plant and animal species are discontinuously distributed throughout the world:

  • Africa has Old World monkeys, apes, elephants, leopards, giraffes, and hornbills.
  • South America has New World monkeys, cougars, jaguars, sloths, llamas, and toucans.
  • Deserts in North and South America have native cacti, but deserts in Africa, Asia, and Australia have succulent (apart from Rhipsalis baccifera) which are native euphorbs that resemble cacti but are very different. [134]

Even greater differences can be found if Australia is taken into consideration, though it occupies the same latitude as much of South America and Africa. Marsupials like kangaroos, bandicoots, and quolls make up about half of Australia's indigenous mammal species. [135] By contrast, marsupials are today totally absent from Africa and form a smaller portion of the mammalian fauna of South America, where opossums, shrew opossums, and the monito del monte occur. The only living representatives of primitive egg-laying mammals (monotremes) are the echidnas and the platypus. The short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) and its subspecies populate Australia, Tasmania, New Guinea, and Kangaroo Island while the long-beaked echidna (Zaglossus bruijni) lives only in New Guinea. The platypus lives in the waters of eastern Australia. They have been introduced to Tasmania, King Island, and Kangaroo Island. These Monotremes are totally absent in the rest of the world. [136] On the other hand, Australia is missing many groups of placental mammals that are common on other continents (carnivorans, artiodactyls, shrews, squirrels, lagomorphs), although it does have indigenous bats and murine rodents many other placentals, such as rabbits and foxes, have been introduced there by humans. [ citation needed ]

Other animal distribution examples include bears, located on all continents excluding Africa, Australia and Antarctica, and the polar bear solely in the Arctic Circle and adjacent land masses. [137] Penguins are found only around the South Pole despite similar weather conditions at the North Pole. Families of sirenians are distributed around the earth's waters, where manatees are located in western Africa waters, northern South American waters, and West Indian waters only while the related family, the dugongs, are located only in Oceanic waters north of Australia, and the coasts surrounding the Indian Ocean. The now extinct Steller's sea cow resided in the Bering Sea. [138]

The same kinds of fossils are found from areas known to be adjacent to one another in the past but that, through the process of continental drift, are now in widely divergent geographic locations. For example, fossils of the same types of ancient amphibians, arthropods and ferns are found in South America, Africa, India, Australia and Antarctica, which can be dated to the Paleozoic Era, when these regions were united as a single landmass called Gondwana. [139]

Island biogeography Edit

Types of species found on islands Edit

Evidence from island biogeography has played an important and historic role in the development of evolutionary biology. For purposes of biogeography, islands are divided into two classes. Continental islands are islands like Great Britain, and Japan that have at one time or another been part of a continent. Oceanic islands, like the Hawaiian islands, the Galápagos Islands and St. Helena, on the other hand are islands that have formed in the ocean and never been part of any continent. Oceanic islands have distributions of native plants and animals that are unbalanced in ways that make them distinct from the biotas found on continents or continental islands. Oceanic islands do not have native terrestrial mammals (they do sometimes have bats and seals), amphibians, or fresh water fish. In some cases they have terrestrial reptiles (such as the iguanas and giant tortoises of the Galápagos Islands) but often (such as in Hawaii) they do not. This is despite the fact that when species such as rats, goats, pigs, cats, mice, and cane toads, are introduced to such islands by humans they often thrive. Starting with Charles Darwin, many scientists have conducted experiments and made observations that have shown that the types of animals and plants found, and not found, on such islands are consistent with the theory that these islands were colonized accidentally by plants and animals that were able to reach them. Such accidental colonization could occur by air, such as plant seeds carried by migratory birds, or bats and insects being blown out over the sea by the wind, or by floating from a continent or other island by sea (for example, by some kinds of plant seeds like coconuts that can survive immersion in salt water), and reptiles that can survive for extended periods on rafts of vegetation carried to sea by storms. [140]

Endemism Edit

Many of the species found on remote islands are endemic to a particular island or group of islands, meaning they are found nowhere else on earth. Examples of species endemic to islands include many flightless birds of New Zealand, lemurs of Madagascar, the Komodo dragon of Komodo, [141] the dragon's blood tree of Socotra, [142] Tuatara of New Zealand, [143] [144] and others. However, many such endemic species are related to species found on other nearby islands or continents the relationship of the animals found on the Galápagos Islands to those found in South America is a well-known example. [140] All of these facts, the types of plants and animals found on oceanic islands, the large number of endemic species found on oceanic islands, and the relationship of such species to those living on the nearest continents, are most easily explained if the islands were colonized by species from nearby continents that evolved into the endemic species now found there. [140]

Other types of endemism do not have to include, in the strict sense, islands. Islands can mean isolated lakes or remote and isolated areas. Examples of these would include the highlands of Ethiopia, Lake Baikal, fynbos of South Africa, forests of New Caledonia, and others. Examples of endemic organisms living in isolated areas include the kagu of New Caledonia, [145] cloud rats of the Luzon tropical pine forests of the Philippines, [146] [147] the boojum tree (Fouquieria columnaris) of the Baja California peninsula, [148] and the Baikal seal. [149]

Adaptive radiations Edit

Oceanic islands are frequently inhabited by clusters of closely related species that fill a variety of ecological niches, often niches that are filled by very different species on continents. Such clusters, like the finches of the Galápagos, Hawaiian honeycreepers, members of the sunflower family on the Juan Fernandez Archipelago and wood weevils on St. Helena are called adaptive radiations because they are best explained by a single species colonizing an island (or group of islands) and then diversifying to fill available ecological niches. Such radiations can be spectacular 800 species of the fruit fly family Drosophila, nearly half the world's total, are endemic to the Hawaiian islands. Another illustrative example from Hawaii is the silversword alliance, which is a group of thirty species found only on those islands. Members range from the silverswords that flower spectacularly on high volcanic slopes to trees, shrubs, vines and mats that occur at various elevations from mountain top to sea level, and in Hawaiian habitats that vary from deserts to rainforests. Their closest relatives outside Hawaii, based on molecular studies, are tarweeds found on the west coast of North America. These tarweeds have sticky seeds that facilitate distribution by migrant birds. [150] Additionally, nearly all of the species on the island can be crossed and the hybrids are often fertile, [60] and they have been hybridized experimentally with two of the west coast tarweed species as well. [151] Continental islands have less distinct biota, but those that have been long separated from any continent also have endemic species and adaptive radiations, such as the 75 lemur species of Madagascar, and the eleven extinct moa species of New Zealand. [140] [152]

Ring species Edit

A ring species is a connected series of populations, each of which can interbreed with its neighbors, with at least two "end" populations which are too distantly related to interbreed, though with the potential for gene flow between all the populations. [153] Ring species represent speciation and have been cited as evidence of evolution. They illustrate what happens over time as populations genetically diverge, specifically because they represent, in living populations, what normally happens over time between long deceased ancestor populations and living populations, in which the intermediates have become extinct. Richard Dawkins says that ring species "are only showing us in the spatial dimension something that must always happen in the time dimension". [154]

Specific examples from biogeography Edit

Distribution of Glossopteris Edit

The combination of continental drift and evolution can sometimes be used to predict what will be found in the fossil record. Glossopteris is an extinct species of seed fern plants from the Permian. Glossopteris appears in the fossil record around the beginning of the Permian on the ancient continent of Gondwana. [155] Continental drift explains the current biogeography of the tree. Present day Glossopteris fossils are found in Permian strata in southeast South America, southeast Africa, all of Madagascar, northern India, all of Australia, all of New Zealand, and scattered on the southern and northern edges of Antarctica. During the Permian, these continents were connected as Gondwana (see figure 4c) in agreement with magnetic striping, other fossil distributions, and glacial scratches pointing away from the temperate climate of the South Pole during the Permian. [156] [157]

Metatherian distribution Edit

The history of metatherians (the clade containing marsupials and their extinct, primitive ancestors) provides an example of how evolutionary theory and the movement of continents can be combined to make predictions concerning fossil stratigraphy and distribution. The oldest metatherian fossils are found in present-day China. [158] Metatherians spread westward into modern North America (still attached to Eurasia) and then to South America, which was connected to North America until around 65 mya. Marsupials reached Australia via Antarctica about 50 mya, shortly after Australia had split off suggesting a single dispersion event of just one species. [159] Evolutionary theory suggests that the Australian marsupials descended from the older ones found in the Americas. Geologic evidence suggests that between 30 and 40 million years ago South America and Australia were still part of the Southern Hemisphere super continent of Gondwana and that they were connected by land that is now part of Antarctica. Therefore, when combining the models, scientists could predict that marsupials migrated from what is now South America, through Antarctica, and then to present-day Australia between 40 and 30 million years ago. A first marsupial fossil of the extinct family Polydolopidae was found on Seymour Island on the Antarctic Peninsula in 1982. [160] Further fossils have subsequently been found, including members of the marsupial orders Didelphimorphia (opossum) and Microbiotheria, [161] as well as ungulates and a member of the enigmatic extinct order Gondwanatheria, possibly Sudamerica ameghinoi. [162] [163] [164]

Migration, isolation, and distribution of the camel Edit

The history of the camel provides an example of how fossil evidence can be used to reconstruct migration and subsequent evolution. The fossil record indicates that the evolution of camelids started in North America (see figure 4e), from which, six million years ago, they migrated across the Bering Strait into Asia and then to Africa, and 3.5 million years ago through the Isthmus of Panama into South America. Once isolated, they evolved along their own lines, giving rise to the Bactrian camel and dromedary in Asia and Africa and the llama and its relatives in South America. Camelids then became extinct in North America at the end of the last ice age. [165]

Scientists have observed and documented a multitude of events where natural selection is in action. The most well known examples are antibiotic resistance in the medical field along with better-known laboratory experiments documenting evolution's occurrence. Natural selection is tantamount to common descent in that long-term occurrence and selection pressures can lead to the diversity of life on earth as found today. All adaptations—documented and undocumented changes concerned—are caused by natural selection (and a few other minor processes). It is well established that, ". natural selection is a ubiquitous part of speciation. ", [166] and is the primary driver of speciation. [167]

Artificial selection and experimental evolution Edit

Artificial selection demonstrates the diversity that can exist among organisms that share a relatively recent common ancestor. In artificial selection, one species is bred selectively at each generation, allowing only those organisms that exhibit desired characteristics to reproduce. These characteristics become increasingly well developed in successive generations. Artificial selection was successful long before science discovered the genetic basis. Examples of artificial selection include dog breeding, genetically modified food, flower breeding, and the cultivation of foods such as wild cabbage, [168] and others. [ citation needed ]

Experimental evolution uses controlled experiments to test hypotheses and theories of evolution. In one early example, William Dallinger set up an experiment shortly before 1880, subjecting microbes to heat with the aim of forcing adaptive changes. His experiment ran for around seven years, and his published results were acclaimed, but he did not resume the experiment after the apparatus failed. [169]

A large-scale example of experimental evolution is Richard Lenski's multi-generation experiment with Escherichia coli. Lenski observed that some strains of E. coli evolved a complex new ability, the ability to metabolize citrate, after tens of thousands of generations. [170] [171] The evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne commented as a critique of creationism, saying, "the thing I like most is it says you can get these complex traits evolving by a combination of unlikely events. That's just what creationists say can't happen." [170] In addition to the metabolic changes, the different bacterial populations were found to have diverged in respect to both morphology (the overall size of the cell) and fitness (of which was measured in competition with the ancestors). [172]

Invertebrates Edit

Historical lead tolerance in Daphnia Edit

A study of species of Daphnia and lead pollution in the 20th century predicted that an increase in lead pollution would lead to strong selection of lead tolerance. Researchers were able to use "resurrection ecology", hatching decades-old Daphnia eggs from the time when lakes were heavily polluted with lead. The hatchlings in the study were compared to current-day Daphnia, and demonstrated "dramatic fitness differences between old and modern phenotypes when confronted with a widespread historical environmental stressor". Essentially, the modern-day Daphnia were unable to resist or tolerate high levels of lead (this is due to the huge reduction of lead pollution in 21st century lakes). The old hatchlings, however, were able to tolerate high lead pollution. The authors concluded that "by employing the techniques of resurrection ecology, we were able to show clear phenotypic change over decades. ". [173]

Peppered moths Edit

A classic example was the phenotypic change, light-to-dark color adaptation, in the peppered moth, due to pollution from the Industrial Revolution in England. [174] [175]

Microbes Edit

Antimicrobial resistance Edit

The development and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is evidence for the process of evolution of species. Thus the appearance of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and the danger it poses to hospital patients, is a direct result of evolution through natural selection. The rise of Shigella strains resistant to the synthetic antibiotic class of sulfonamides also demonstrates the generation of new information as an evolutionary process. [176] Similarly, the appearance of DDT resistance in various forms of Anopheles mosquitoes, and the appearance of myxomatosis resistance in breeding rabbit populations in Australia, are both evidence of the existence of evolution in situations of evolutionary selection pressure in species in which generations occur rapidly.

All classes of microbes develop resistance: including fungi (antifungal resistance), viruses (antiviral resistance), protozoa (antiprotozoal resistance), and bacteria (antibiotic resistance). This is to be expected when considering that all life exhibits universal genetic code and is therefore subject to the process of evolution through its various mechanisms.

Nylon-eating bacteria Edit

Another example of organisms adapting to human-caused conditions are Nylon-eating bacteria: a strain of Flavobacterium that are capable of digesting certain byproducts of nylon 6 manufacturing. There is scientific consensus that the capacity to synthesize nylonase most probably developed as a single-step mutation that survived because it improved the fitness of the bacteria possessing the mutation. This is seen as a good example of evolution through mutation and natural selection that has been observed as it occurs and could not have come about until the production of nylon by humans. [177] [178] [179] [180]

Plants and fungi Edit

Monkeyflower radiation Edit

Both subspecies Mimulus aurantiacus puniceus (red-flowered) and Mimulus aurantiacus australis (yellow-flowered) of monkeyflowers are isolated due to the preferences of their hummingbird and hawkmoth pollinators. The radiation of M. aurantiacus subspecies are mostly yellow colored however, both M. a. ssp. puniceus and M. a. ssp. flemingii are red. Phylogenetic analysis suggests two independent origins of red-colored flowers that arose due to cis-regulatory mutations in the gene MaMyb2 that is present in all M. aurantiacus subspecies. Further research suggested that two independent mutations did not take place, but one MaMyb2 allele was transferred via introgressive hybridization. [181]

Radiotrophic fungi Edit

Like the codfish, human-caused pollution can come in different forms. Radiotrophic fungi is a perfect example of natural selection taking place after a chemical accident. Radiotrophic fungi appears to use the pigment melanin to convert gamma radiation into chemical energy for growth and were first discovered in 2007 as black molds growing inside and around the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Research at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine showed that three melanin-containing fungi, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Wangiella dermatitidis, and Cryptococcus neoformans, increased in biomass and accumulated acetate faster in an environment in which the radiation level was 500 times higher than in the normal environment. [182] [183]

Vertebrates Edit

Guppies Edit

While studying guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in Trinidad, biologist John Endler detected selection at work on the fish populations. To rule out alternative possibilities, Endler set up a highly controlled experiment to mimic the natural habitat by constructing ten ponds within a laboratory greenhouse at Princeton University. Each pond contained gravel to exactly match that of the natural ponds. After capturing a random sample of guppies from ponds in Trinidad, he raised and mixed them to create similar genetically diverse populations and measured each fish (spot length, spot height, spot area, relative spot length, relative spot height, total patch area, and standard body lengths). For the experiment he added Crenicichla alta (P. reticulata's main predator) in four of the ponds, Rivulus hartii (a non-predator fish) in four of the ponds, and left the remaining two ponds empty with only the guppies. After 10 generations, comparisons were made between each pond's guppy populations and measurements were taken again. Endler found that the populations had evolved dramatically different color patterns in the control and non-predator pools and drab color patterns in the predator pool. Predation pressure had caused a selection against standing out from background gravel. [184]

In parallel, during this experiment, Endler conducted a field experiment in Trinidad where he caught guppies from ponds where they had predators and relocated them to ponds upstream where the predators did not live. After 15 generations, Endler found that the relocated guppies had evolved dramatic and colorful patterns. Essentially, both experiments showed convergence due to similar selection pressures (i.e. predator selection against contrasting color patterns and sexual selection for contrasting color patterns). [184]

In a later study by David Reznick, the field population was examined 11 years later after Endler relocated the guppies to high streams. The study found that the populations has evolved in a number of different ways: bright color patterns, late maturation, larger sizes, smaller litter sizes, and larger offspring within litters. [185] Further studies of P. reticulata and their predators in the streams of Trinidad have indicated that varying modes of selection through predation have not only changed the guppies color patterns, sizes, and behaviors, but their life histories and life history patterns. [186]

Humans Edit

Natural selection is observed in contemporary human populations, with recent findings demonstrating that the population at risk of the severe debilitating disease kuru has significant over-representation of an immune variant of the prion protein gene G127V versus non-immune alleles. Scientists postulate one of the reasons for the rapid selection of this genetic variant is the lethality of the disease in non-immune persons. [187] [188] Other reported evolutionary trends in other populations include a lengthening of the reproductive period, reduction in cholesterol levels, blood glucose and blood pressure. [189]

A well known example of selection occurring in human populations is lactose tolerance. Lactose intolerance is the inability to metabolize lactose, because of a lack of the required enzyme lactase in the digestive system. The normal mammalian condition is for the young of a species to experience reduced lactase production at the end of the weaning period (a species-specific length of time). In humans, in non-dairy consuming societies, lactase production usually drops about 90% during the first four years of life, although the exact drop over time varies widely. [190] Lactase activity persistence in adults is associated with two polymorphisms: C/T 13910 and G/A 22018 located in the MCM6 gene. [191] This gene difference eliminates the shutdown in lactase production, making it possible for members of these populations to continue consumption of raw milk and other fresh and fermented dairy products throughout their lives without difficulty. This appears to be an evolutionarily recent (around 10,000 years ago [and 7,500 years ago in Europe] [192] ) adaptation to dairy consumption, [193] and has occurred independently in both northern Europe and east Africa in populations with a historically pastoral lifestyle. [194] [195]

Italian wall lizards Edit

In 1971, ten adult specimens of Podarcis sicula (the Italian wall lizard) were transported from the Croatian island of Pod Kopište to the island Pod Mrčaru (about 3.5 km to the east). Both islands lie in the Adriatic Sea near Lastovo, where the lizards founded a new bottlenecked population. [196] [197] The two islands have similar size, elevation, microclimate, and a general absence of terrestrial predators [197] and the P. sicula expanded for decades without human interference, even out-competing the (now locally extinct [196] ) Podarcis melisellensis population. [198]

In the 1990s, scientists returned to Pod Mrčaru and found that the lizards there differed greatly from those on Kopište. While mitochondrial DNA analyses have verified that P. sicula currently on Mrčaru are genetically very similar to the Kopište source population, [196] the new Mrčaru population of P. sicula had a larger average size, shorter hind limbs, lower maximal sprint speed and altered response to simulated predatory attacks compared to the original Kopište population. [197] These changes were attributed to "relaxed predation intensity" and greater protection from vegetation on Mrčaru. [197]

In 2008, further analysis revealed that the Mrčaru population of P. sicula have significantly different head morphology (longer, wider, and taller heads) and increased bite force compared to the original Kopište population. [196] This change in head shape corresponded with a shift in diet: Kopište P. sicula are primarily insectivorous, but those on Mrčaru eat substantially more plant matter. [196] The changes in foraging style may have contributed to a greater population density and decreased territorial behavior of the Mrčaru population. [196]

Another difference found between the two populations was the discovery, in the Mrčaru lizards, of cecal valves, which slow down food passage and provide fermenting chambers, allowing commensal microorganisms to convert cellulose to nutrients digestible by the lizards. [196] Additionally, the researchers discovered that nematodes were common in the guts of Mrčaru lizards, but absent from Kopište P. sicula, which do not have cecal valves. [196] The cecal valves, which occur in less than 1 percent of all known species of scaled reptiles, [196] have been described as an "adaptive novelty, a brand new feature not present in the ancestral population and newly evolved in these lizards". [199]

PAH resistance in killifish Edit

A similar study was also done regarding the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that pollute the waters of the Elizabeth River in Portsmouth, Virginia. This chemical is a product of creosote, a type of tar. The Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) has evolved a resistance to PAHs involving the AHR gene (the same gene involved in the tomcods). This particular study focused on the resistance to "acute toxicity and cardiac teratogenesis" caused by PAHs. that mutated within the tomcods in the Hudson River. [200]

PCB resistance in codfish Edit

An example involving the direct observation of gene modification due to selection pressures is the resistance to PCBs in codfish. After General Electric dumped polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the Hudson River from 1947 through 1976, tomcods (Microgadus tomcod) living in the river were found to have evolved an increased resistance to the compound's toxic effects. [201] The tolerance to the toxins is due to a change in the coding section of specific gene. Genetic samples were taken from the cods from 8 different rivers in the New England region: the St. Lawrence River, Miramichi River, Margaree River, Squamscott River, Niantic River, the Shinnecock Basic, the Hudson River, and the Hackensack River. Genetic analysis found that in the population of tomcods in the four southernmost rivers, the gene AHR2 (aryl hydrocarbon receptor 2) was present as an allele with a difference of two amino acid deletions. [202] This deletion conferred a resistance to PCB in the fish species and was found in 99% of Hudson River tomcods, 92% in the Hackensack River, 6% in the Niantic River, and 5% in Shinnecock Bay. [202] This pattern along the sampled bodies of waters infers a direct correlation of selective pressures leading to the evolution of PCB resistance in Atlantic tomcod fish. [202]

Urban wildlife Edit

Urban wildlife is a broad and easily observable case of human-caused selection pressure on wildlife. With the growth in human habitats, different animals have adapted to survive within these urban environments. These types of environments can exert selection pressures on organisms, often leading to new adaptations. For example, the weed Crepis sancta, found in France, has two types of seed, heavy and fluffy. The heavy ones land nearby to the parent plant, whereas fluffy seeds float further away on the wind. In urban environments, seeds that float far often land on infertile concrete. Within about 5–12 generations, the weed evolves to produce significantly heavier seeds than its rural relatives. [203] [204] Other examples of urban wildlife are rock pigeons and species of crows adapting to city environments around the world African penguins in Simon's Town baboons in South Africa and a variety of insects living in human habitations. Studies have been conducted and have found striking changes to animals' (more specifically mammals') behavior and physical brain size due to their interactions with human-created environments. [205] [206]

White Sands lizards Edit

Animals that exhibit ecotonal variations allow for research concerning the mechanisms that maintain population differentiation. A wealth of information about natural selection, genotypic, and phenotypic variation [207] [208] adaptation and ecomorphology [209] and social signaling [210] has been acquired from the studies of three species of lizards located in the White Sands desert of New Mexico. Holbrookia maculata, Aspidoscelis inornatus, and Sceloporus undulatus exhibit ecotonal populations that match both the dark soils and the white sands in the region. Research conducted on these species has found significant phenotypic and genotypic differences between the dark and light populations due to strong selection pressures. For example, H. maculata exhibits the strongest phenotypic difference (matches best with the substrate) of the light colored population coinciding with the least amount of gene flow between the populations and the highest genetic differences when compared to the other two lizard species. [207]

New Mexico's White Sands are a recent geologic formation (approximately 6000 years old [210] to possibly 2000 years old [207] ). This recent origin of these gypsum sand dunes suggests that species exhibiting lighter-colored variations have evolved in a relatively short time frame. The three lizard species previously mentioned have been found to display variable social signal coloration in coexistence with their ecotonal variants. [210] Not only have the three species convergently evolved their lighter variants due to the selection pressures from the environment, they've also evolved ecomorphological differences: morphology, behavior (in is case, escape behavior), and performance (in this case, sprint speed) collectively. [209] Roches' work found surprising results in the escape behavior of H. maculata and S. undulatus. When dark morphs were placed on white sands, their startle response was significantly diminished. This result could be due to varying factors relating to sand temperature or visual acuity however, regardless of the cause, "…failure of mismatched lizards to sprint could be maladaptive when faced with a predator". [209]

Speciation is the evolutionary process by which new biological species arise. Biologists research species using different theoretical frameworks for what constitutes a species (see species problem and species complex) and there exists debate with regard to delineation. [211] Nevertheless, much of the current research suggests that, ". speciation is a process of emerging genealogical distinctness, rather than a discontinuity affecting all genes simultaneously" [212] and, in allopatry (the most common form of speciation), "reproductive isolation is a byproduct of evolutionary change in isolated populations, and thus can be considered an evolutionary accident". [213] Speciation occurs as the result of the latter (allopatry) however, a variety of differing agents have been documented and are often defined and classified in various forms (e.g. peripatric, parapatric, sympatric, polyploidization, hybridization, etc.). Instances of speciation have been observed in both nature and the laboratory. A.-B Florin and A. Ödeen note that, "strong laboratory evidence for allopatric speciation is lacking. " however, contrary to laboratory studies (focused specifically on models of allopatric speciation), "speciation most definitely occurs [and] the vast amount of evidence from nature makes it unreasonable to argue otherwise". [214] Coyne and Orr compiled a list of 19 laboratory experiments on Drosophila presenting examples of allopatric speciation by divergent selection concluding that, "reproductive isolation in allopatry can evolve as a byproduct of divergent selection". [215]

Research documenting speciation is abundant. Biologists have documented numerous examples of speciation in nature—with evolution having produced far more species than any observer would consider necessary. For example, there are well over 350,000 described species of beetles. [216] Examples of speciation come from the observations of island biogeography and the process of adaptive radiation, both explained previously. Evidence of common descent can also be found through paleontological studies of speciation within geologic strata. The examples described below represent different modes of speciation and provide strong evidence for common descent. It is important to acknowledge that not all speciation research directly observes divergence from "start-to-finish". This is by virtue of research delimitation and definition ambiguity, and occasionally leads research towards historical reconstructions. In light of this, examples abound, and the following are by no means exhaustive—comprising only a small fraction of the instances observed. Once again, take note of the established fact that, ". natural selection is a ubiquitous part of speciation. ", [166] and is the primary driver of speciation, [167] so hereinafter, examples of speciation will often interdepend and correspond with selection.

Fossils Edit

Limitations exist within the fossil record when considering the concept of what constitutes a species. Paleontologists largely rely on a different framework: the morphological species concept. [217] Due to the absence of information such as reproductive behavior or genetic material in fossils, paleontologists distinguish species by their phenotypic differences. [217] Extensive investigation of the fossil record has led to numerous theories concerning speciation (in the context of paleontology) with many of the studies suggesting that stasis, punctuation, and lineage branching are common. In 1995, D. H. Erwin, et al. published a major work—New Approaches to Speciation in the Fossil Record—which compiled 58 studies of fossil speciation (between 1972 and 1995) finding most of the examples suggesting stasis (involving anagenesis or punctuation) and 16 studies suggesting speciation. [217] Despite stasis appearing to be the predominate conclusion at first glance, this particular meta-study investigated deeper, concluding that, ". no single pattern appears dominate. " with ". the preponderance of studies illustrating both stasis and gradualism in the history of a single lineage". [218] Many of the studies conducted utilize seafloor sediments that can provide a significant amount of data concerning planktonic microfossils. [217] The succession of fossils in stratigraphy can be used to determine evolutionary trends among fossil organisms. In addition, incidences of speciation can be interpreted from the data and numerous studies have been conducted documenting both morphological evolution and speciation.

Globorotalia Edit

Extensive research on the planktonic foraminifer Globorotalia truncatulinoides has provided insight into paleobiogeographical and paleoenvironmental studies alongside the relationship between the environment and evolution. In an extensive study of the paleobiogeography of G. truncatulinoides, researchers found evidence that suggested the formation of a new species (via the sympatric speciation framework). Cores taken of the sediment containing the three species G. crassaformis, G. tosaensis, and G. truncatulinoides found that before 2.7 Ma, only G. crassaformis and G. tosaensis existed. A speciation event occurred at that time, whereby intermediate forms existed for quite some time. Eventually G. tosaensis disappears from the record (suggesting extinction) but exists as an intermediate between the extant G. crassaformis and G. truncatulinoides. This record of the fossils also matched the already existing phylogeny constructed by morphological characters of the three species. [219] See figure 6a.

Radiolaria Edit

In a large study of five species of radiolarians (Calocycletta caepa, Pterocanium prismatium, Pseudoculous vema, Eucyrtidium calvertense, and Eucyrtidium matuyamai), the researchers documented considerable evolutionary change in each lineage. Alongside this, trends with the closely related species E. calvertense and E. matuyamai showed that about 1.9 Mya E. calvertense invaded a new region of the Pacific, becoming isolated from the main population. The stratigraphy of this species clearly shows that this isolated population evolved into E. Matuyamai. It then reinvaded the region of the still-existing and static E. calvertense population whereby a sudden decrease in body size occurred. Eventually the invader E. matuyamai disappeared from the stratum (presumably due to extinction) coinciding with a desistance of size reduction of the E. calvertense population. From that point on, the change in size leveled to a constant. The authors suggest competition-induced character displacement. [220] [221]

Rhizosolenia Edit

Researchers conducted measurements on 5,000 Rhizosolenia (a planktonic diatom) specimens from eight sedimentary cores in the Pacific Ocean. The core samples spanned two million years and were chronologized using sedimentary magnetic field reversal measurements. All the core samples yielded a similar pattern of divergence: with a single lineage (R. bergonii) occurring before 3.1 Mya and two morphologically distinct lineages (daughter species: R. praebergonii) appearing after. The parameters used to measure the samples were consistent throughout each core. [222] An additional study of the daughter species R. praebergonii found that, after the divergence, it invaded the Indian Ocean. [217] [223]

Turborotalia Edit

A recent study was conducted involving the planktonic foraminifer Turborotalia. The authors extracted "51 stratigraphically ordered samples from a site within the oceanographically stable tropical North Pacific gyre". Two hundred individual species were examined using ten specific morphological traits (size, compression index, chamber aspect ratio, chamber inflation, aperture aspect ratio, test height, test expansion, umbilical angle, coiling direction, and the number of chambers in the final whorl). Utilizing multivariate statistical clustering methods, the study found that the species continued to evolve non-directionally within the Eocene from 45 Ma to about 36 Ma. However, from 36 Ma to approximately 34 Ma, the stratigraphic layers showed two distinct clusters with significantly defining characteristics distinguishing one another from a single species. The authors concluded that speciation must have occurred and that the two new species were ancestral to the prior species. [224]

Vertebrates Edit

There exists evidence for vertebrate speciation despite limitations imposed by the fossil record. Studies have been conducted documenting similar patterns seen in marine invertebrates. [217] For example, extensive research documenting rates of morphological change, evolutionary trends, and speciation patterns in small mammals has significantly contributed to the scientific literature. [225]

A study of four mammalian genera: Hyopsodus, Pelycodus, Haplomylus (three from the Eocene), and Plesiadapis (from the Paleocene) found that—through a large number of stratigraphic layers and specimen sampling—each group exhibited, "gradual phyletic evolution, overall size increase, iterative evolution of small species, and character divergence following the origin of each new lineage". [226] The authors of this study concluded that speciation was discernible. In another study concerning morphological trends and rates of evolution found that the European arvicolid rodent radiated into 52 distinct lineages over a time frame of 5 million years while documenting examples of phyletic gradualism, punctuation, and stasis. [227]

Invertebrates Edit

Drosophila melanogaster Edit

William R. Rice and George W. Salt found experimental evidence of sympatric speciation in the common fruit fly. They collected a population of Drosophila melanogaster from Davis, California and placed the pupae into a habitat maze. Newborn flies had to investigate the maze to find food. The flies had three choices to take in finding food. Light and dark (phototaxis), up and down (geotaxis), and the scent of acetaldehyde and the scent of ethanol (chemotaxis) were the three options. This eventually divided the flies into 42 spatio-temporal habitats. They then cultured two strains that chose opposite habitats. One of the strains emerged early, immediately flying upward in the dark attracted to the acetaldehyde. The other strain emerged late and immediately flew downward, attracted to light and ethanol. Pupae from the two strains were then placed together in the maze and allowed to mate at the food site. They then were collected. A selective penalty was imposed on the female flies that switched habitats. This entailed that none of their gametes would pass on to the next generation. After 25 generations of this mating test, it showed reproductive isolation between the two strains. They repeated the experiment again without creating the penalty against habitat switching and the result was the same reproductive isolation was produced. [228] [229] [230]

Gall wasps Edit

A study of the gall-forming wasp species Belonocnema treatae found that populations inhabiting different host plants (Quercus geminata and Q. virginiana) exhibited different body size and gall morphology alongside a strong expression of sexual isolation. The study hypothesized that B. treatae populations inhabiting different host plants would show evidence of divergent selection promoting speciation. The researchers sampled gall wasp species and oak tree localities, measured body size (right hand tibia of each wasp), and counted gall chamber numbers. In addition to measurements, they conducted mating assays and statistical analyses. Genetic analysis was also conducted on two mtDNA sites (416 base pairs from cytochrome C and 593 base pairs from cytochrome oxidase ) to "control for the confounding effects of time since divergence among allopatric populations". [231]

In an additional study, the researchers studied two gall wasp species B. treatae and Disholcaspis quercusvirens and found strong morphological and behavioral variation among host-associated populations. This study further confounded prerequisites to speciation. [232]

Hawthorn fly Edit

One example of evolution at work is the case of the hawthorn fly, Rhagoletis pomonella, also known as the apple maggot fly, which appears to be undergoing sympatric speciation. [233] Different populations of hawthorn fly feed on different fruits. A distinct population emerged in North America in the 19th century some time after apples, a non-native species, were introduced. This apple-feeding population normally feeds only on apples and not on the historically preferred fruit of hawthorns. The current hawthorn feeding population does not normally feed on apples. Some evidence, such as the fact that six out of thirteen allozyme loci are different, that hawthorn flies mature later in the season and take longer to mature than apple flies and that there is little evidence of interbreeding (researchers have documented a 4–6% hybridization rate) suggests that speciation is occurring. [234] [235] [236] [237] [238]

London Underground mosquito Edit

The London Underground mosquito is a species of mosquito in the genus Culex found in the London Underground. It evolved from the overground species Culex pipiens. This mosquito, although first discovered in the London Underground system, has been found in underground systems around the world. It is suggested that it may have adapted to human-made underground systems since the last century from local above-ground Culex pipiens, [239] although more recent evidence suggests that it is a southern mosquito variety related to Culex pipiens that has adapted to the warm underground spaces of northern cities. [240]

The two species have very different behaviours, [241] are extremely difficult to mate, [239] and with different allele frequency, consistent with genetic drift during a founder event. [242] More specifically, this mosquito, Culex pipiens molestus, breeds all-year round, is cold intolerant, and bites rats, mice, and humans, in contrast to the above ground species Culex pipiens that is cold tolerant, hibernates in the winter, and bites only birds. When the two varieties were cross-bred the eggs were infertile suggesting reproductive isolation. [239] [241]

The genetic data indicates that the molestus form in the London Underground mosquito appears to have a common ancestry, rather than the population at each station being related to the nearest aboveground population (i.e. the pipiens form). Byrne and Nichols' working hypothesis was that adaptation to the underground environment had occurred locally in London only once. These widely separated populations are distinguished by very minor genetic differences, which suggest that the molestus form developed: a single mtDNA difference shared among the underground populations of ten Russian cities [243] a single fixed microsatellite difference in populations spanning Europe, Japan, Australia, the middle East and Atlantic islands. [240]

Snapping shrimp and the isthmus of Panama Edit

Debate exists determining when the isthmus of Panama closed. Much of the evidence supports a closure approximately 2.7 to 3.5 mya using ". multiple lines of evidence and independent surveys". [244] However, a recent study suggests an earlier, transient bridge existed 13 to 15 mya. [245] Regardless of the timing of the isthmus closer, biologists can study the species on the Pacific and Caribbean sides in, what has been called, "one of the greatest natural experiments in evolution." [244] Studies of snapping shrimp in the genus Alpheus have provided direct evidence of allopatric speciation events, [246] and contributed to the literature concerning rates of molecular evolution. [247] Phylogenetic reconstructions using "multilocus datasets and coalescent-based analytical methods" support the relationships of the species in the group [244] and molecular clock techniques support the separation of 15 pairs of Alpheus species between 3 and 15 million years ago. [247]

Plants Edit

The botanist Verne Grant pioneered the field of plant speciation with his research and major publications on the topic. [248] As stated before, many biologists rely on the biological species concept, with some modern researchers utilizing the phylogenetic species concept. Debate exists in the field concerning which framework should be applied in the research. [248] Regardless, reproductive isolation is the primary role in the process of speciation and has been studied extensively by biologists in their respective disciplines.

Both hybridization and polyploidy have also been found to be major contributors to plant speciation. [249] With the advent of molecular markers, "hybridization [is] considerably more frequent than previously believed". [248] In addition to these two modes leading to speciation, pollinator preference and isolation, chromosomal rearrangements, and divergent natural selection have become critical to the speciation of plants. Furthermore, recent research suggests that sexual selection, epigenetic drivers, and the creation of incompatible allele combinations caused by balancing selection also contribute to the formation of new species. [249] Instances of these modes have been researched in both the laboratory and in nature. Studies have also suggested that, due to "the sessile nature of plants. [it increases] the relative importance of ecological speciation. " [250]

Hybridization between two different species sometimes leads to a distinct phenotype. This phenotype can also be fitter than the parental lineage and as such, natural selection may then favor these individuals. Eventually, if reproductive isolation is achieved, it may lead to a separate species. However, reproductive isolation between hybrids and their parents is particularly difficult to achieve and thus hybrid speciation is considered a rare event. However, hybridization resulting in reproductive isolation is considered an important means of speciation in plants, [251] since polyploidy (having more than two copies of each chromosome) is tolerated in plants more readily than in animals. [252] [253]

Polyploidy is important in hybrids as it allows reproduction, with the two different sets of chromosomes each being able to pair with an identical partner during meiosis. [254] Polyploids also have more genetic diversity, which allows them to avoid inbreeding depression in small populations. [255] Hybridization without change in chromosome number is called homoploid hybrid speciation. It is considered very rare but has been shown in Heliconius butterflies [256] and sunflowers. Polyploid speciation, which involves changes in chromosome number, is a more common phenomenon, especially in plant species.

Polyploidy is a mechanism that has caused many rapid speciation events in sympatry because offspring of, for example, tetraploid x diploid matings often result in triploid sterile progeny. [257] Not all polyploids are reproductively isolated from their parental plants, and gene flow may still occur for example through triploid hybrid x diploid matings that produce tetraploids, or matings between meiotically unreduced gametes from diploids and gametes from tetraploids. It has been suggested that many of the existing plant and most animal species have undergone an event of polyploidization in their evolutionary history. [254] [258] Reproduction of successful polyploid species is sometimes asexual, by parthenogenesis or apomixis, as for unknown reasons many asexual organisms are polyploid. Rare instances of polyploid mammals are known, but most often result in prenatal death.

Researchers consider reproductive isolation as key to speciation. [259] A major aspect of speciation research is to determine the nature of the barriers that inhibit reproduction. Botanists often consider the zoological classifications of prezygotic and postzygotic barriers as inadequate. [259] The examples provided below give insight into the process of speciation.

Mimulus peregrinus Edit

The creation of a new allopolyploid species of monkeyflower (Mimulus peregrinus) was observed on the banks of the Shortcleuch Water—a river in Leadhills, South Lanarkshire, Scotland. Parented from the cross of the two species Mimulus guttatus (containing 14 pairs of chromosomes) and Mimulus luteus (containing 30-31 pairs from a chromosome duplication), M. peregrinus has six copies of its chromosomes (caused by the duplication of the sterile hybrid triploid). Due to the nature of these species, they have the ability to self-fertilize. Because of its number of chromosomes it is not able to pair with M. guttatus, M. luteus, or their sterile triploid offspring. M. peregrinus will either die, producing no offspring, or reproduce with itself effectively leading to a new species. [260] [261]

Raphanobrassica Edit

Raphanobrassica includes all intergeneric hybrids between the genera Raphanus (radish) and Brassica (cabbages, etc.). [262] [263] The Raphanobrassica is an allopolyploid cross between the radish (Raphanus sativus) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea). Plants of this parentage are now known as radicole. Two other fertile forms of Raphanobrassica are known. Raparadish, an allopolyploid hybrid between Raphanus sativus and Brassica rapa is grown as a fodder crop. "Raphanofortii" is the allopolyploid hybrid between Brassica tournefortii and Raphanus caudatus. The Raphanobrassica is a fascinating plant, because (in spite of its hybrid nature), it is not sterile. This has led some botanists to propose that the accidental hybridization of a flower by pollen of another species in nature could be a mechanism of speciation common in higher plants.

Senecio (groundsel) Edit

The Welsh groundsel is an allopolyploid, a plant that contains sets of chromosomes originating from two different species. Its ancestor was Senecio × baxteri, an infertile hybrid that can arise spontaneously when the closely related groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) and Oxford ragwort (Senecio squalidus) grow alongside each other. Sometime in the early 20th century, an accidental doubling of the number of chromosomes in an S. × baxteri plant led to the formation of a new fertile species. [264] [265]

The York groundsel (Senecio eboracensis) is a hybrid species of the self-incompatible Senecio squalidus (also known as Oxford ragwort) and the self-compatible Senecio vulgaris (also known as common groundsel). Like S. vulgaris, S. eboracensis is self-compatible however, it shows little or no natural crossing with its parent species, and is therefore reproductively isolated, indicating that strong breed barriers exist between this new hybrid and its parents. It resulted from a backcrossing of the F1 hybrid of its parents to S. vulgaris. S. vulgaris is native to Britain, while S. squalidus was introduced from Sicily in the early 18th century therefore, S. eboracensis has speciated from those two species within the last 300 years.

Other hybrids descended from the same two parents are known. Some are infertile, such as S. x baxteri. Other fertile hybrids are also known, including S. vulgaris var. hibernicus, now common in Britain, and the allohexaploid S. cambrensis, which according to molecular evidence probably originated independently at least three times in different locations. Morphological and genetic evidence support the status of S. eboracensis as separate from other known hybrids. [266]

Thale cress Edit

Kirsten Bomblies et al. from the Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology discovered two genes in the thale cress plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. When both genes are inherited by an individual, it ignites a reaction in the hybrid plant that turns its own immune system against it. In the parents, the genes were not detrimental, but they evolved separately to react defectively when combined. [267] To test this, Bomblies crossed 280 genetically different strains of Arabidopsis in 861 distinct ways and found that 2 percent of the resulting hybrids were necrotic. Along with allocating the same indicators, the 20 plants also shared a comparable collection of genetic activity in a group of 1,080 genes. In almost all of the cases, Bomblies discovered that only two genes were required to cause the autoimmune response. Bomblies looked at one hybrid in detail and found that one of the two genes belonged to the NB-LRR class, a common group of disease resistance genes involved in recognizing new infections. When Bomblies removed the problematic gene, the hybrids developed normally. [267] Over successive generations, these incompatibilities could create divisions between different plant strains, reducing their chances of successful mating and turning distinct strains into separate species. [268]

Tragopogon (salsify) Edit

Tragopogon is one example where hybrid speciation has been observed. In the early 20th century, humans introduced three species of salsify into North America. These species, the western salsify (Tragopogon dubius), the meadow salsify (Tragopogon pratensis), and the oyster plant (Tragopogon porrifolius), are now common weeds in urban wastelands. In the 1950s, botanists found two new species in the regions of Idaho and Washington, where the three already known species overlapped. One new species, Tragopogon miscellus, is a tetraploid hybrid of T. dubius and T. pratensis. The other new species, Tragopogon mirus, is also an allopolyploid, but its ancestors were T. dubius and T. porrifolius. These new species are usually referred to as "the Ownbey hybrids" after the botanist who first described them. The T. mirus population grows mainly by reproduction of its own members, but additional episodes of hybridization continue to add to the T. mirus population. [269]

T. dubius and T. pratensis mated in Europe but were never able to hybridize. A study published in March 2011 found that when these two plants were introduced to North America in the 1920s, they mated and doubled the number of chromosomes in there hybrid Tragopogon miscellus allowing for a "reset" of its genes, which in turn, allows for greater genetic variation. Professor Doug Soltis of the University of Florida said, "We caught evolution in the act…New and diverse patterns of gene expression may allow the new species to rapidly adapt in new environments". [270] [271]

Vertebrates Edit

Blackcap Edit

The bird species, Sylvia atricapilla, commonly referred to as blackcaps, lives in Germany and flies southwest to Spain while a smaller group flies northwest to Great Britain during the winter. Gregor Rolshausen from the University of Freiburg found that the genetic separation of the two populations is already in progress. The differences found have arisen in about 30 generations. With DNA sequencing, the individuals can be assigned to a correct group with an 85% accuracy. Stuart Bearhop from the University of Exeter reported that birds wintering in England tend to mate only among themselves, and not usually with those wintering in the Mediterranean. [272] It is still inference to say that the populations will become two different species, but researchers expect it due to the continued genetic and geographic separation. [273]

Mollies Edit

The shortfin molly (Poecilia mexicana) is a small fish that lives in the Sulfur Caves of Mexico. Years of study on the species have found that two distinct populations of mollies—the dark interior fish and the bright surface water fish—are becoming more genetically divergent. [274] The populations have no obvious barrier separating the two however, it was found that the mollies are hunted by a large water bug (Belostoma spp). Tobler collected the bug and both types of mollies, placed them in large plastic bottles, and put them back in the cave. After a day, it was found that, in the light, the cave-adapted fish endured the most damage, with four out of every five stab-wounds from the water bugs sharp mouthparts. In the dark, the situation was the opposite. The mollies' senses can detect a predator's threat in their own habitats, but not in the other ones. Moving from one habitat to the other significantly increases the risk of dying. Tobler plans on further experiments, but believes that it is a good example of the rise of a new species. [275]

Polar bear Edit

Natural selection, geographic isolation, and speciation in progress are illustrated by the relationship between the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) and the brown bear (Ursus arctos). Considered separate species throughout their ranges [276] however, it has been documented that they possess the capability to interbreed and produce fertile offspring. This introgressive hybridization has occurred both in the wild and in captivity and has been documented [277] and verified with DNA testing. [278] The oldest known fossil evidence of polar bears dates around 130,000 to 110,000 years ago [279] however, molecular data has revealed varying estimates of divergence time. Mitochondrial DNA analysis has given an estimate of 150,000 years ago [279] while nuclear genome analysis has shown an approximate divergence of 603,000 years ago. [280] Recent research using the complete genomes (rather than mtDNA or partial nuclear genomes) establishes the divergence of polar and brown bears between 479 and 343 thousand years ago. [281] Despite the differences in divergence rates, molecular research suggests the sister species have undergone a highly complex process of speciation and admixture between the two. [282]

The polar bear has acquired anatomical and physiological differences from the brown bear that allow it to comfortably survive in conditions that the brown bear likely could not. Notable examples include the ability to swim sixty miles or more at a time in freezing waters, fur that blends with the snow, and to stay warm in the arctic environment, an elongated neck that makes it easier to keep their heads above water while swimming, and oversized and heavy-matted webbed feet that act as paddles when swimming. It has also evolved small papillae and vacuole-like suction cups on the soles to make them less likely to slip on the ice, alongside smaller ears for a reduction of heat loss, eyelids that act like sunglasses, accommodations for their all-meat diet, a large stomach capacity to enable opportunistic feeding, and the ability to fast for up to nine months while recycling their urea. [283] [284]

Animal coloration provided important early evidence for evolution by natural selection, at a time when little direct evidence was available. Three major functions of coloration were discovered in the second half of the 19th century, and subsequently used as evidence of selection: camouflage (protective coloration) mimicry, both Batesian and Müllerian and aposematism. After the circumstantial evidence provided by Darwin in On the Origin of Species, and given the absence of mechanisms for genetic variation or heredity at that time, naturalists including Darwin's contemporaries, Henry Walter Bates and Fritz Müller sought evidence from what they could observe in the field. [286]

Mimicry and aposematism Edit

Bates and Müller described forms of mimicry that now carry their names, based on their observations of tropical butterflies. These highly specific patterns of coloration are readily explained by natural selection, since predators such as birds which hunt by sight will more often catch and kill insects that are less good mimics of distasteful models than those that are better mimics but the patterns are otherwise hard to explain. [287] Darwinists such as Alfred Russel Wallace and Edward Bagnall Poulton, and in the 20th century Hugh Cott and Bernard Kettlewell, sought evidence that natural selection was taking place. [288] [289] The efficacy of mimicry in butterflies was demonstrated in controlled experiments by Jane Van Zandt Brower in 1958. [290] [291] [292]

Camouflage Edit

In 1889, Wallace noted that snow camouflage, especially plumage and pelage that changed with the seasons, suggested an obvious explanation as an adaptation for concealment. [293] [285] Poulton's 1890 book, The Colours of Animals, written during Darwinism's lowest ebb, used all the forms of coloration to argue the case for natural selection. [294] Cott described many kinds of camouflage, mimicry and warning coloration in his 1940 book Adaptive Coloration in Animals, and in particular his drawings of coincident disruptive coloration in frogs convinced other biologists that these deceptive markings were products of natural selection. [288] Kettlewell experimented on peppered moth evolution, showing that the species had adapted as pollution changed the environment this provided compelling evidence of Darwinian evolution. [289]

Computer science allows the iteration of self-changing complex systems to be studied, allowing a mathematical understanding of the nature of the processes behind evolution providing evidence for the hidden causes of known evolutionary events. The evolution of specific cellular mechanisms like spliceosomes that can turn the cell's genome into a vast workshop of billions of interchangeable parts that can create tools that create us can be studied for the first time in an exact way.

"It has taken more than five decades, but the electronic computer is now powerful enough to simulate evolution", [295] assisting bioinformatics in its attempt to solve biological problems.

Computational evolutionary biology has enabled researchers to trace the evolution of a large number of organisms by measuring changes in their DNA, rather than through physical taxonomy or physiological observations alone. It has compared entire genomes permitting the study of more complex evolutionary events, such as gene duplication, horizontal gene transfer, and the prediction of factors important in speciation. It has also helped build complex computational models of populations to predict the outcome of the system over time and track and share information on an increasingly large number of species and organisms.

Future endeavors are to reconstruct a now more complex tree of life.

Christoph Adami, a professor at the Keck Graduate Institute made this point in Evolution of biological complexity:

To make a case for or against a trend in the evolution of complexity in biological evolution, complexity must be both rigorously defined and measurable. A recent information-theoretic (but intuitively evident) definition identifies genomic complexity with the amount of information a sequence stores about its environment. We investigate the evolution of genomic complexity in populations of digital organisms and monitor in detail the evolutionary transitions that increase complexity. We show that, because natural selection forces genomes to behave as a natural "Maxwell Demon", within a fixed environment, genomic complexity is forced to increase. [296]

David J. Earl and Michael W. Deem—professors at Rice University made this point in Evolvability is a selectable trait:

Not only has life evolved, but life has evolved to evolve. That is, correlations within protein structure have evolved, and mechanisms to manipulate these correlations have evolved in tandem. The rates at which the various events within the hierarchy of evolutionary moves occur are not random or arbitrary but are selected by Darwinian evolution. Sensibly, rapid or extreme environmental change leads to selection for greater evolvability. This selection is not forbidden by causality and is strongest on the largest-scale moves within the mutational hierarchy. Many observations within evolutionary biology, heretofore considered evolutionary happenstance or accidents, are explained by selection for evolvability. For example, the vertebrate immune system shows that the variable environment of antigens has provided selective pressure for the use of adaptable codons and low-fidelity polymerases during somatic hypermutation. A similar driving force for biased codon usage as a result of productively high mutation rates is observed in the hemagglutinin protein of influenza A. [297]

"Computer simulations of the evolution of linear sequences have demonstrated the importance of recombination of blocks of sequence rather than point mutagenesis alone. Repeated cycles of point mutagenesis, recombination, and selection should allow in vitro molecular evolution of complex sequences, such as proteins." [298] Evolutionary molecular engineering, also called directed evolution or in vitro molecular evolution involves the iterated cycle of mutation, multiplication with recombination, and selection of the fittest of individual molecules (proteins, DNA, and RNA). Natural evolution can be relived showing us possible paths from catalytic cycles based on proteins to based on RNA to based on DNA. [298] [299] [300] [301]

The Avida computer simulation has been used to test evidence of common descent and natural selection. [302] [303] In one example it has been used to demonstrate that natural selection can favor altruism, something that had been predicted but is difficult to test empirically. At the higher replication rates allowed by the simulation it becomes observable. [304]

Grade 3 - 3-LS4 Biological Evolution: Unity and Diversity

Please Login or Subscribe to access downloadable content.

Use Teacher Login to show answer keys or other teacher-only items.

NGSS Disciplinary Core Ideas
LS2.C: Ecosystem Dynamics, Functioning, and Resilience
&bull When the environment changes in ways that affect a place&rsquos physical characteristics, temperature, or availability of resources, some organisms survive and reproduce, others move to new locations, yet others move into the transformed environment, and some die. (secondary to 3-LS4-4)
LS4.A: Evidence of Common Ancestry and Diversity
&bull Some kinds of plants and animals that once lived on Earth are no longer found anywhere. (Note: moved from K-2) (3-LS4-1)
&bull Fossils provide evidence about the types of organisms that lived long ago and also about the nature of their environments. (3-LS4-1)
LS4.B: Natural Selection
&bull Sometimes the differences in characteristics between individuals of the same species provide advantages in surviving, finding mates, and reproducing. (3-LS4-2)
LS4.C: Adaptation
&bull For any particular environment, some kinds of organisms survive well, some survive less well, and some cannot survive at all. (3-LS4-3)
LS4.D: Biodiversity and Humans
&bull Populations live in a variety of habitats, and change in those habitats affects the organisms living there. (3-LS4-4)
Performance Expectations Students who demonstrate understanding can:
Analyze and interpret data from fossils to provide evidence of the organisms and the environments in which they lived long ago.
3-LS4-2. Use evidence to construct an explanation for how the variations in characteristics among individuals of the same species may provide advantages in surviving, finding mates, and reproducing.
3-LS4-3. Construct an argument with evidence that in a particular habitat some organisms can survive well, some survive less well, and some cannot survive at all.
3-LS4-4.Make a claim about the merit of a solution to a problem caused when the environment changes and the types of plants and animals that live there may change.*

Use the Template and Resource Links to Fulfill NGSS

  1. Understand that when an environment changes, it affects the species (animals and plants) living there.
  2. Understand that some species have gone extinct and there is fossil evidence of their existence.
  3. Understand the process of natural selection and how it affects survival and reproduction.
  4. Understand what a &ldquopopulation&rdquo is and how a change in their environment can affect them.

Essential Questions:

  1. How does human civilization affect an environment and the animals and plants that live there?
  2. What kinds of things may have caused the different extinctions (before and after the emergence of humans) throughout time?
  3. Can you think of how different traits may improve the survival and reproduction of different animals and plants (including humans)?
  4. Choose one type of environment and list some of the animals and plants that thrive there, those that may be there is small numbers, and those those that do not live there at all (i.e. a desert environment).
  5. Can you name a population of animals (or plants) that was greatly affected by a change to its habitat?

NGSS Note: Think, question, entertain ideas.

ll. Introductory Activities to Assess Prior Knowledge

B. Brainstorming Session
What does an animal need to stay alive, find a mate and reproduce in its environment?
1. Break students down into groups of 3-4.
2. Ask students to generate a list of what a specific animal (each group can choose their own or you can choose an animal and habitat in which it lives, i.e. lion on the African Savannah) needs to stay alive, find a mate and reproduce in its environment.
3. Discuss

lll. New Knowledge - Text

Read about how environmental changes can affect the animals that live there.

Read about Keystone Species &ndash species that affect their environment in a significant way:

Read about Environmental Destruction:
Habitat Loss Generally
Panda and Habitat Loss

Examples of Models (depicts the concept expressed in the reading):

Ask students to look at the models and explain how each illustrates the concept.

Forest Fires - Ecosystem Dynamics, Functioning, and Resilience

Look at the Model below as a visual aid for comprehension of the process of how environmental change can impact organisms:

To view these resources with no ads, please Login or Subscribe (and help support our site).

lV. Experiments, Activities, Model-making (Critical Thinking)

Inquiry related to Environmental Change, Adaptation, Natural Selection:

Authentic Performance - Understanding by Design (UbD) assessment tool.

Use critical thinking to complete this Authentic Performance Activity and deepen understanding about adaptations and natural selection.

V. Summarize Knowledge - Enduring Understandings

  1. When an environment changes, it affects the organisms (animals, plants, etc.) living there and some will survive and reproduce better than others.
  2. Some species have gone extinct and there is fossil evidence of their existence and habitats.
  3. Natural selection shows that some inherited traits can help an organism survive and reproduce with more success than others.
  4. Not all organisms are as successful in their habitat as others.
  5. A &ldquopopulation&rdquo of organisms is affected by a change in their habitat.

Disciplinary Core Ideas
LS2.C: Ecosystem Dynamics, Functioning, and Resilience
&bull When the environment changes in ways that affect a place&rsquos physical characteristics, temperature, or availability of resources, some organisms survive and reproduce, others move to new locations, yet others move into the transformed environment, and some die. (secondary to 3-LS4-4)

LS4.A: Evidence of Common Ancestry and Diversity
&bull Some kinds of plants and animals that once lived on Earth are no longer found anywhere. (Note: moved from K-2) (3-LS4-1)
&bull Fossils provide evidence about the types of organisms that lived long ago and also about the nature of their environments. (3-LS4-1)

LS4.B: Natural Selection
&bull Sometimes the differences in characteristics between individuals of the same species provide advantages in surviving, finding mates, and reproducing. (3-LS4-2)

LS4.C: Adaptation
&bull For any particular environment, some kinds of organisms survive well, some survive less well, and some cannot survive at all. (3-LS4-3)

LS4.D: Biodiversity and Humans
&bull Populations live in a variety of habitats, and change in those habitats affects the organisms living there. (3-LS4-4)

Science and Engineering Practices (NGSS)

Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Analyzing data in 3&ndash5 builds on K&ndash2 experiences and progresses to introducing quantitative approaches to collecting data and conducting multiple trials of qualitative observations. When possible and feasible, digital tools should be used.
&bull Analyze and interpret data to make sense of phenomena using logical reasoning. (3-LS4-1)

Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions
Constructing explanations and designing solutions in 3&ndash5 builds on K&ndash2 experiences and progresses to the use of evidence in constructing explanations that specify variables that describe and predict phenomena and in designing multiple solutions to design problems.
&bull Use evidence (e.g., observations, patterns) to construct an explanation. (3-LS4-2)

Engaging in Argument from Evidence
Engaging in argument from evidence in 3&ndash5 builds on K&ndash2 experiences and progresses to critiquing the scientific explanations or solutions proposed by peers by citing relevant evidence about the natural and designed world(s).
&bull Construct an argument with evidence. (3-LS4-3)
&bull Make a claim about the merit of a solution to a problem by citing relevant evidence about how it meets the criteria and constraints of the problem. (3-LS4-4)

Crosscutting Concepts (NGSS)

Cause and Effect
&bull Cause and effect relationships are routinely identified and used to explain change. (3-LS4-2),(3-LS4-3)

Scale, Proportion, and Quantity
&bull Observable phenomena exist from very short to very long time periods. (3-LS4-1)

Systems and System Models
&bull A system can be described in terms of its components and their interactions. (3-LS4-4)

Connections to Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science

Interdependence of Engineering, Technology, and Science on Society and the Natural World
&bull Knowledge of relevant scientific concepts and research findings is important in engineering. (3-LS4-4)

Connections to Nature of Science

Scientific Knowledge Assumes an Order and Consistency in Natural Systems
&bull Science assumes consistent patterns in natural systems. (3-LS4-1)

Performance Expectations

Students who demonstrate understanding can:

3-LS4-1. Analyze and interpret data from fossils to provide evidence of the organisms and the environments in which they lived long ago. [Clarification Statement: Examples of data could include type, size, and distributions of fossil organisms. Examples of fossils and environments could include marine fossils found on dry land, tropical plant fossils found in Arctic areas, and fossils of extinct organisms.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment does not include identification of specific fossils or present plants and animals. Assessment is limited to major fossil types and relative ages.]

3-LS4-2. Use evidence to construct an explanation for how the variations in characteristics among individuals of the same species may provide advantages in surviving, finding mates, and reproducing. [Clarification Statement: Examples of cause and effect relationships could be plants that have larger thorns than other plants may be less likely to be eaten by predators and, animals that have better camouflage coloration than other animals may be more likely to survive and therefore more likely to leave offspring.]

3-LS4-3. Construct an argument with evidence that in a particular habitat some organisms can survive well, some survive less well, and some cannot survive at all. [Clarification Statement: Examples of evidence could include needs and characteristics of the organisms and habitats involved. The organisms and their habitat make up a system in which the parts depend on each other.]

3-LS4-4.Make a claim about the merit of a solution to a problem caused when the environment changes and the types of plants and animals that live there may change.* [Clarification Statement: Examples of environmental changes could include changes in land characteristics, water distribution, temperature, food, and other organisms.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to a single environmental change. Assessment does not include the greenhouse effect or climate change.]

Common Core State Standards Connections

RI.3.1 Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text, referring explicitly to the text as the basis for the answers. (3-LS4-1),(3-LS4-2),(3-LS4-3),(3-LS4-4)
RI.3.2 Determine the main idea of a text recount the key details and explain how they support the main idea. (3-LS4-1),(3-LS4-2),(3-LS4-3),(3-LS4-4)
RI.3.3 Describe the relationship between a series of historical events, scientific ideas or concepts, or steps in technical procedures in a text, using language that pertains to time, sequence, and cause/effect. (3-LS4-1),(3-LS4-2),(3-LS4-3),(3-LS4-4)
W.3.1 Write opinion pieces on topics or texts, supporting a point of view with reasons. (3-LS4-1),(3-LS4-3),(3-LS4-4)
W.3.2 Write informative/explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas and information clearly. (3-LS4-1),(3-LS4-2),(3-LS4-3),(3-LS4-4)
W.3.8 Recall information from experiences or gather information from print and digital sources take brief notes on sources and sort evidence into provided categories. (3-LS4-1)
SL.3.4 Report on a topic or text, tell a story, or recount an experience with appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details, speaking clearly at an understandable pace. (3-LS4-2),(3-LS4-3),(3-LS4-4)

Evidence for network evolution in an Arabidopsis interactome map

Plants have unique features that evolved in response to their environments and ecosystems. A full account of the complex cellular networks that underlie plant-specific functions is still missing. We describe a proteome-wide binary protein-protein interaction map for the interactome network of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana containing about 6200 highly reliable interactions between about 2700 proteins. A global organization of plant biological processes emerges from community analyses of the resulting network, together with large numbers of novel hypothetical functional links between proteins and pathways. We observe a dynamic rewiring of interactions following gene duplication events, providing evidence for a model of evolution acting upon interactome networks. This and future plant interactome maps should facilitate systems approaches to better understand plant biology and improve crops.


Quality of AI-1 MAIN . ( A ) Fraction of PRS, RRS or…

Quality of AI-1 MAIN . ( A ) Fraction of PRS, RRS or…

Plant signaling networks in AI-1.…

Plant signaling networks in AI-1. ( A ) Putative ubiquitination subnetwork extracted from…

Plant signaling networks in AI-1.…

Plant signaling networks in AI-1. ( A ) Putative ubiquitination subnetwork extracted from…

Communities in AI-1 MAIN (bottom)…

Communities in AI-1 MAIN (bottom) and in a typical randomized network (top left…

Evidence for network evolution in…

Evidence for network evolution in AI-1 MAIN . ( A ) Interaction rewiring…

Evidence for network evolution in…

Evidence for network evolution in AI-1 MAIN . ( A ) Interaction rewiring…

Evidence for network evolution in…

Evidence for network evolution in AI-1 MAIN . ( A ) Interaction rewiring…

Evidence for network evolution in…

Evidence for network evolution in AI-1 MAIN . ( A ) Interaction rewiring…

Evidence for network evolution in…

Evidence for network evolution in AI-1 MAIN . ( A ) Interaction rewiring…

3.3: Evidence of Evolution - Biology

Resource Type: Web Activity

Biogeography: Polar Bears and Penguins The north and south polar regions of Earth are inhabited by very different organisms. Why are there no polar bears in the Antarctic, and no penguins in the Arctic? Evolution of the Eye Zoologist Dan Erik Nilsson demonstrates how the complex human eye could have evolved from simple light-sensitive cells. From Evolution: "Darwin's Dangerous Idea."

Resource Type: Video
Length: 4 min, 8 sec

Biogeography: Polar Bears and Penguins
The north and south polar regions of Earth are inhabited by very different organisms. Why are there no polar bears in the Antarctic, and no penguins in the Arctic?

Island Biogeography: ecology, evolution, and conservation
This textbook synopsis provides a condensed introduction to the field of biogeography. Hosted by the School of Geography and the Environment at Oxford University.

Evidence Supporting Biological Evolution
This site explains how fossil, molecular, biogeographic, and comparative anatomical studies provide evidence for evolution. The illustrations must be loaded individually, but are worth the trouble. Hosted by the National Academy of Sciences.

Evolution: Converging Lines of Evidence
In this article, author P. Wesley Edwards discusses the gamut of evidence for evolution, showing converging lines of evidence from the fields of paleontology, biogeography, molecular biology, embryology, and comparative anatomy. Hosted by the Freethought Debater.

Island Biogeography and Evolution
In this activity, high school students perform biogeographic analysis to infer the evolutionary history of a group of three lizard species in the Canary Islands. Teacher instructions and a variety of possible outcomes of the activity are included. Hosted by the University of California Museum of Paleontology.

Observed Instances of Speciation
This Talk.Origins discussion begins with a clear and thorough explanation of the difficulties of the species concept, then moves on to review the extensive primary literature (to 1995), organized by speciation mechanism. The bibliography is enormous. Hosted by Talk.Origins.

On the Law Which Has Regulated the Introduction of New Species
This 1855 text, written at Sarawak in Borneo, represents Wallace's early thinking on the origin of species, pre-natural selection. Hosted by Western Kentucky University.

On the Zoological Geography of the Malay Archipelago
In this 1859 manuscript, Wallace details the geographical placement of various groups of animals in the archipelago and pinpoints the location of the dividing line, now called "Wallace's Line," dividing Eurasian and Australasian fauna. Hosted by Western Kentucky University.

This site provides a clear explanation for how three basic evolutionary mechanisms -- sympatric, allopatric, and parapatric speciation -- work. Hosted by the University of Miami.

Species, Speciation and the Environment
In this article, paleontologist Niles Eldredge chronicles the history of the study of speciation, highlighting the notion of punctuated equilibrium. The links and bibliography can take you to additional useful information on the topic of species and speciation. Hosted by

The Evidence for Evolution: Biogeography
This site explains how the biogeography of organisms, which keeps closely related species in fairly close proximity, provides further evidence for evolution. The role of plate tectonics in determining geographic locations of organisms is also discussed. Hosted by Nova Southeastern University.

Biodiversity is a Guarantee of Evolution
This transcript of an interview with Nobel Prize-winning microbiologist Werner Arber reveals his opinions about the origins of biodiversity and its evolutionary and ecological consequences. By Serafin Garcia Ibanez [UNESCO Courier 49 (1996): 4-8].

This college-level text provides a thorough introduction to the principles of biogeography, and includes the original map of zoogeographic regions drawn by Alfred Russel Wallace. By James H. Brown and Mark V. Lomolino [Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1998].

Crowding Innovation out of Evolution
This "Research News" article examines the theory that evolution produces some threshold level of biodiversity and then diversification levels off as all the available "ecospace" gets filled. By Richard A. Kerr [Science 266 (1994): 1163-1167].

Early Cambrian Paleogeography and Tectonic History: A Biogeographic Approach
This analysis shows how biogeographical and geophysical studies can inform each other, using the breakup of the supercontinent Rodinia during the early Cambrian as a case in point. By Bruce S. Lierberman [Geology 25 (1997): 1039-1043].

Early Hominid Biogeography
This paper compares hypothetical biogeographical patterns of primitive hominids with known dispersal patterns of Plio-Pleistocene African mammals. By David S. Strait and Bernard A. Wood [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96 (1999): 9196-9201].

Endless Forms: Species and Speciation
This book contains up-to-date information about species concepts, speciation modes, reproductive isolating mechanisms, and hybridization. Edited by Daniel J. Howard and Stewart H. Berlocher [Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 1998].

Evolution on Islands
Intended for an advanced scientific audience, this book provides an introduction to the field of island biogeography and individual chapters detailing biogeographical studies of plants and animals. Speciation receives much attention, and the bibliography is extensive. Edited by Peter R. Grant [New York: Oxford University Press, 1998].

Genes, Peoples and Languages
In this book, the author explains the historical spread of genes, peoples, cultures, and languages through Europe in the past 5,000 years, based on genetic, anthropological, and biogeographic evidence. By Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza [Translated by Mark Seielstad. New York: North Point Press, 2000].

Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies
This book is a biogeography of diseases, culture, and historical development. By Jared Diamond [New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1997].

Populations, Species, and Evolution
The abridged version of the classic 1963 text Animal Species and Evolution explains the biological species concept in the context of animal evolution. By Ernst Mayr [Cambridge: Belknap, Harvard University Press, 1970].

The Beak of the Finch
This book is a beautifully written chronicle of more than three decades of study of evolution observed firsthand among the Galapagos finches. By Jonathan Weiner [New York: Vintage Books, 1999].

The Geographical Distribution of Animals
This enormous two-volume text essentially explains "what lives where and why," based on Wallace's developing tenets of zoogeography. By Alfred Russel Wallace [New York: Harper, 1876].

The Origin and Function of Biodiversity
In this scientific paper, the author explains how biodiversity originates, evolves, and becomes extinct. In addition, he discusses the importance of biodiversity to an ecosystem's ability to adapt to environmental change. By O.T. Solbrig [Environment 33 (1991): 16-26].

The Song of the Dodo: Island Biogeography in an Age of Extinctions
In this book, the author explores current patterns of extinction, and why they are happening, in the context of island biogeography. By David Quammen [New York: Scribner, 1996].

Variation and Evolution in Plants
This classic work explains classification of plant species, many of which do not conform to the biological species definition, and how speciation occurs among plants. By G. Ledyard Stebbins [New York: Columbia University Press, 1950].

Vent Fauna and Plate Tectonics
This short paper discusses the relationship between current biogeographies of hydrothermal vent communities and past configurations of Earth's tectonic plates. By Laura Garwin [Nature 379 (1996): 492].

Evolution of the Eye
Zoologist Dan Erik Nilsson demonstrates how the complex human eye could have evolved from simple light-sensitive cells. From Evolution: "Darwin's Dangerous Idea."

Common Past, Different Paths
This time-lapse microphotography of developing embryos shows the common ancestry of all vertebrates. Footage from NOVA: "Odyssey of Life."

Tetrapod Limbs
This illustration shows the remarkable similarities between the bones in the forelimbs of various tetrapods, all of whose limbs serve very different functions.

Comparative Embryology: The Vertebrate Body
Developing embryos of five species are illustrated in this graphic. The accompanying article discusses the similarities and differences between the embryos at various stages of development.

The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm
In this full-text article from the 1979 Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Lewontin present their well-supported, though still controversial, argument against the notion that all phenotypic traits are adaptations. Hosted by the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Adaptive Compromises & Imperfections: Primate Pelves: Birth Problems in Humans
This series of sketches shows the relative sizes of primate newborns and the adult female pelvis, revealing the mismatch that occurs in humans. As the human brain has increased in size, the pelvic opening has not kept pace. Hosted by ENSI.

Adaptive Compromises & Imperfections: Where Airways and Foodways Cross: Choking
These sketches show how the changed position of the human larynx, relative to that of our closest relative, the chimpanzee, causes a potential choking hazard during eating. Hosted by ENSI.

Darwin's Evidence: Rudimentary Organs
These lecture notes, from a New York University course on evolutionary biology, provide a brief overview of the scientific argument that rudimentary structures reveal the evolutionary history of an organism.

Evidence for Jury-Rigged Design in Nature
This article explains how phenotypic constraints can be imposed by the evolutionary history (phylogeny) of a species. After the introduction, there are lists of examples of these "maladapted" organisms and descriptions of the elaborate tactics some must employ to get around their handicaps. Hosted by Talk.Origins.

Evidence Supporting Biological Evolution
This site explains how fossil, molecular, biogeographic, and comparative anatomical studies provide evidence for evolution. The illustrations must be loaded individually, but are worth the trouble. Hosted by the National Academy of Sciences.

Evolution: Converging Lines of Evidence
In this article, author P. Wesley Edwards discusses the gamut of evidence for evolution, showing converging lines of evidence from the fields of paleontology, biogeography, molecular biology, embryology, and comparative anatomy. Hosted by the Freethought Debater.

Eye-opening Gene
This article summarizes the new findings that challenge the traditional view that eyes have evolved independently in many animal lineages and includes a very focused bibliography of additional references. Hosted by Science News Online.

Irish Elk Antlers
This site describes and shows fossil images of the extinct Irish elk, whose immense antlers are thought to have been a product of sexual selection. Hosted by the University of California Museum of Paleontology.

Journey into Phylogenetic Systematics
This site thoroughly and clearly presents the purpose, methodology, and implications of cladistic systematics, which seeks to organize living things by their evolutionary relationships. Also included is an exceptionally useful glossary of phylogenetic terms. Hosted by the University of California Museum of Paleontology.

This page offers succinct explanations of the three types of mimicry: Batesian, Mullerian, and aggressive. By M.Tevfik Dorak.

Phylogeny of Life
This site showcases the diversity of life, organized by evolutionary relationships. Hosted by the University of California Museum of Paleontology.

Some Adaptations & Imperfections
Suitable for the high school level and up, this table lists a variety of unusual features found in humans and other animals, and asks you to determine which are vestigial, contrivances, atavisms, and adaptations. Hosted by ENSI.

The Evidence for Evolution: Comparative Anatomy and Embryos
This site explores Darwin's idea of descent with modification, which leaves behind structural similarities in related descendants. Whether comparing embryos or adults, such homologous structures indicate evolution from a common ancestor. Hosted by Nova Southeastern University.

Climbing Mount Improbable
In this book, the author provides a comprehensive account explaining that evolution occurs as a result of many small steps of change. Readers will also find elaborate discussions of the evolution of such things as spider webs, flight adaptations, and dozens of independently evolved eyes. By Richard Dawkins [New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1996].

Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches
This classic book details the findings of Peter and Rosemary Grant, who made firsthand observations of the evolution of Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands. By Peter Grant [Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986].

Evolution and Tinkering
In this paper, the author explains how evolution progresses by modification of existing structures, which causes some less-than-optimal designs. By Francois Jacob [Science 196 (1977): 1161-1166].

Exaptation - A Missing Term in the Science of Form
In this technical paper, the authors argue that "adaptation" should refer only to features that still hold their original adaptive purpose, while "exaptation" should be used to describe features that originated for another pupose and have been co-opted for their current adaptive function. By Stephen Jay Gould and Elisabeth S. Vrba [Paleobiology 8 (1982): 4-15].

Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes
In this collection of essays, the author clearly explains how structural and functional limitations, phylogeny, and natural selection together impose design constraints on organisms. These constraints have produced a wide array of less-than-perfect, and sometimes quite bizarre, features. By Stephen Jay Gould [New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1983].

Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology
Written for an advanced scientific audience, this text explains how the concept of homology is a central theme underlying studies from molecular biology to ethology and evolutionary biology. Edited by Brian K. Hall [San Diego: Academic Press, 1994].

Ontogeny and Phylogeny
In this book, the author scrutinizes Haeckel's biogenetic law of "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" and reviews the newer well-supported notion of heterochrony among related organisms, even those with a distant common ancestor. By Stephen Jay Gould [Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1977].

Structural Homologies
This video examines a variety of homologous structure in insects, vertebrates, and plants, and explains how homologies can be used to infer common ancestry. Produced and directed by Jack Smith [Princeton, N.J.: Films for the Humanities, 1998].

The Blind Watchmaker
In this book, the author refutes the creationist claim that living things are so complex that they must have been purposefully designed, showing instead that they have been produced by a "blind" watchmaker -- natural selection. By Richard Dawkins [1986. Reprint, New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1996].

The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection
In this book, the author makes a clear, if technical, argument for the evolution of biological complexity among certain groups of organisms, citing design constraints imposed by physical and chemical laws as important drivers of such evolution. By John Tyler Bonner [Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988].

The Panda's Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History
In this essay, the author describes the anatomy and origin of the panda's thumb, which is not really a thumb at all, as an illustration of how imperfections in design can sometimes offer the best evidence for evolution. By Stephen Jay Gould [New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1980].

The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form
Written for an advanced audience, this book explains how genes from primitive ancestors constrains the development of modern animal species. By Rudolf A. Raff [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996].

Riddle of the Bones
Piece together clues to how one of our early ancestors looked as you examine images from four significant fossil finds of A. afarensis.

Becoming a Fossil
This video segment describes how the Australopithecus afarensis skeleton known as Lucy could have been fossilized. Footage courtesy of NOVA: "In Search of Human Origins."

Evolving Ideas: How Do We Know Evolution Happens?
This video for high school students focuses on one of the several lines of evidence for evolution -- fossils, highlighting the evolution of whales from land-dwelling mammals to the aquatic creatures we know today.

Neil Shubin and Ted Daeschler: How Fish Came Ashore
In this transcript of an interview filmed for Evolution: "Great Transformations," Neil Shubin and Ted Daeschler describe the transition of vertebrate life from water to land.

Ted Daeschler and Neil Shubin: Early Tetrapod Fossils
In this transcript of interview filmed for Evolution: "Great Transformations," Ted Daeschler and Neil Shubin describe the discovery and significance of some of their key fossil finds.

Evolution and the Fossil Record
Beginning with the evolution of our universe, this book chronicles the origins of life on Earth and subsequent patterns of evolution and extinction, as evidenced by the fossil and geologic records. By Keith Allen and Derek Biggs [Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1990].

Accuracy of Fossils and Dating Techniques
This article summarizes and aims to debunk some creationist claims about the fossil record and then provides a simple explanation of absolute and relative dating methods used to date fossils. Hosted by

Evidence of Evolutionary Transitions
At this site, vertebrate paleontologist Michael Benton describes two missing links: the one between reptiles and birds, and the many steps between reptiles and mammals. Hosted by

Evidence Supporting Biological Evolution
This site explains how fossil, molecular, biogeographic, and comparative anatomical studies provide evidence for evolution. The illustrations must be loaded individually, but are worth the trouble. Hosted by the National Academy of Sciences.

Evolution: Converging Lines of Evidence
In article, author P. Wesley Edwards discusses the gamut of evidence for evolution, showing converging lines of evidence from the fields of paleontology, biogeography, molecular biology, embryology, and comparative anatomy. Hosted by the Freethought Debater.

Evolution: Fact and Theory
This article succinctly describes the patterns in nature that evolutionary theory seeks to explain, plus known mechanisms of evolution and lines of evidence that evolution is a fact. At the end, you'll find links to information on a wide variety of related topics. Hosted by

Introduction to the Cetacea: Whales and Dolphins
This site contains an article that looks at the evolution of the ancestors of today's whales and dolphins, written by paleoantologist Dr. Hans Thewissen. Hosted by the University of California Museum of Paleontology.

Learning from the Fossil Record
This in-depth site is an interesting source of articles about fossils, phylogenetics, and much more. Hosted by University of California Museum of Paleontology.

The Evidence for Evolution: The Fossil Record
This site describes and visually depicts the major types of fossils and explains the processes by which they form. Hosted by Nova Southeastern University.

The Geologic Time Scale
This site contains a summary of the geological time scale, with links to the organization's online publication Geologic Time and a guide to the major fossil groups. Hosted by the U.S. Geological Survey.

The Record of Time
This site contains a tutorial on fossil formation and dating techniques. Hosted by Palomar College.

Time Machine
This site helps students understand deep time with the ENSI "Time Machine" lesson.

Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ
For students of paleontology and evolutionary biology, the site contains an extensive bibliography of mainly primary literature. Also included is a massive manuscript describing an impressive array of transitional vertebrate species, as known from the fossil record. Hosted by Talk.Origins.

Whale Origins
This site contains some best guesses about the origin of whales. Links lead to more information about each of the six groups of archaeocetes, or "old whales." Hosted by the Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine.

What does the fossil record tell us about evolution?
This site explains how the fossil record alone provides sufficient evidence for evolution and provides links to other FAQs on related subjects. The Evolution sites are placed within the larger Agnosticism/Atheism topic, which will cause many to bristle, but the information is accurate. Hosted by

Zoom Dinosaurs
This site contains a comprehesive look at fossils, including fossilization, dating of fossils, and fossils found on all the continents. Hosted by

Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism
In this thoroughly logical and clearly written book, the author disassembles one inconsistent creationist argument after another, leaving in each one's place a clear summary of the scientific evidence for evolution. Evidence comes from a variety of sources, including the fossil record. By Philip Kitcher [Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983].

Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs
This book contains hundreds of articles on many dinosaur-related topics. Edited by Kevin Padian and P.J. Currie [San Diego: Academic Press, 1997].

Evolutionary Biology, 3rd ed.
An excellent college-level textbook for the serious student of modern evolutionary theory. Chapter 6 deals with fossil evidence of evolution. Chapter 22 discusses evolution at the level of the gene. By Douglas J. Futuyma [Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1998].

Finding Darwin's God: A Scientist's Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution
In this book, the author neatly summarizes major elements of evolutionary theory and attempts to reconcile a belief in God and an acceptance of evolution. By Kenneth R. Miller [New York: Cliff Street Books, 2000].

Genetics and the Origin of Species
This influential work provides an exceptionally clear, though technical, synthesis of the early theory of population genetics, along with data showing genetic differences between species. The book provided evidence for the genetic basis of evolution. By Theodosius Dobzhansky [New York: Columbia University Press, 1937].

Hooking Leviathan by its Past
This article clearly presents the fossil discoveries which have built an increasingly convincing case that whales evolved from land-based species. By Stephen Jay Gould [Natural History, May 1994].

Human Origins: The Fossil Record, 3rd ed.
This pictorial guide provides illustrations of each of the major steps in human evolution. Accompanying each image is general information about the specimen plus its approximate age and geographical location. By Clark Spencer Larsen, Robert M. Matter, and Daniel L. Gebo [Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press, 1998].

Lessons from the Past: Biotic Recoveries from Mass Extinctions
This review paper discusses the effects of mass extinctions on macroevolution. According to fossil evidence, it seems that extinctions create evolutionary opportunities for biodiversity "rebounds" by clearing niches for new species. By Douglas H. Erwin [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (2001): 5399-5404].

Once We Were Not Alone
This paper discusses the theory that, while only one species of hominids, Homo sapiens, survives today, several hominid species once coexisted. A proposed "family tree" for hominids is given, plus hypothetical locations and reasons for extinction for each species. By Ian Tattersall [Scientific American, January 2000: 56-63].

Science on Trial: The Case for Evolution
Designed as a response to creationism, this book provides students, educators, and general readers with the evidence for evolution, an explanation of evolutionary processes, a refutation of the claims of creationists, and insight into the nature of scientific inquiry. By Douglas J. Futuyma [Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1995].

Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy
Written for a lay audience, this book explains how evolutionary theory informs philosophical issues such as morality and reasoning. By Michael Ruse [Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1998].

Tempo and Mode in Evolution: Genetics and Paleontology 50 Years after Simpson
This collection of papers focuses on molecular and fossil lines of evidence for evolutionary change. Edited by Walter M. Fitch and Francisco J. Ayala [Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1995].

The Book of Life
This book, which chronologically surveys evolution, includes submissions from renowned experts Jack Sepkoski, Michael Benton, and others. Dynamic illustrations and graphs complement the strong writing. The book will appeal to students and general readers wanting an in-depth review of the history of life. Edited by Stephen Jay Gould [New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2001].

The Complete Dinosaur
This collection of manuscripts by various dinosaur experts is a compendium of all that is currently known about dinosaurs, from their appearance to their extinction, as deduced from fossil evidence. Edited by James O. Farlow and M.K. Brett-Surman [Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1997].

The Emergence of Whales: Evolutionary Patterns in the Origin of Cetacea
This book, intended for an advanced scientific audience, provides a detailed survey of what is currently known about the evolution of modern whales from a group of terrestrial ungulates. Edited by J.G.M. Thewissen [New York: Plenum Press, 1998].

The End of Evolution
In this book, a geologist describes investigations of the fossil evidence that two major mass extinction events have occurred on Earth, then convincingly argues that humans are currently causing the third mass extinction. By Peter Douglas Ward [New York: Bantam Books, 1994].

The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight
This article examines the extensive and compelling evidence supporting the hypothesis that birds are living dinosaurs whose adaptations for flight began as adaptations for hunting. By K. Padian and L. Chiappe [Scientific American, February 1998, 38-47].

Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History
In this book, the author describes the discovery and analysis of the fossils of the Burgess Shale and shares his belief that the history of life is not a gradual progression toward a higher end instead, he suggests chance and contingency play a greater role in determining extinction and survival of life on Earth. By Stephen Jay Gould [New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1981].

The Common Genetic Code
Paul Nurse describes his research that showed that humans share some genes with organisms as different from us as simple brewer's yeast. Footage from Secret of Life: "Immortal Thread."

Matt Scott: Molecular Architects
In this transcript of an interview filmed for Evolution: "Great Transformations," Matt Scott describes the process and implications for finding genes that control animal development.

Mike Levine: Basic Body Plans
In this interview filmed for Evolution: "Great Transformations," molecular biologist Mike Levine describes his work with homeotic genes in embryonic development.

Walter Gehring: Master Control Genes and the Evolution of the Eye
In his interview filmed for Evolution: "Great Transformations," Professor Walter Gehring describes the evoluton of the eye and his research into the genetic switch that controls their formation.

Birds and DNA
Using photos of a variety of bird species, this site explains how grouping organisms on the basis of appearance can lead to errors in phylogenetic determination, while groupings based on DNA sequence analysis can "see past" convergently evolved morphologies to give accurate phylogenies. Hosted by Museum Victoria.

Evidence Supporting Biological Evolution
This site explains how fossil, molecular, biogeographic, and comparative anatomical studies provide evidence for evolution. The illustrations must be loaded individually, but are worth the trouble. Hosted by the National Academy of Sciences.

Evolution: Converging Lines of Evidence
In this article, author P. Wesley Edwards discusses the gamut of evidence for evolution, showing converging lines of evidence from the fields of paleontology, biogeography, molecular biology, embryology, and comparative anatomy. Hosted by the Freethought Debater.

Fossils cast doubt on Molecular Clock
This summary of an original scientific paper questions the concept of the so-called "molecular clock" used to calculate how long ago two or more species diverged, based on conflicting fossil evidence. Hosted by the Australian Broadcasing Company, News in Science.

Miracles and Molecules
In this critical review of Michael Behe's book Darwin's Black Box, evolutionary biologist Dr. Doug Futuyma explains that the findings of molecular biology have provided additional, and exceptionally strong, evidence for evolution. Several example molecules are discussed. Hosted by the Boston Review at MIT.

The Molecular Anatomy of an Ancient Adaptive Event
This article explains how molecular phylogenetic and other biochemical techniques were used to determine that one key enzyme evolved into two distinct forms billions of years ago. Hosted by Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society.

Evolution and the Myth of Creationism
This book provides a thorough yet clearly written explanation of the various lines of evidence for evolution. By Tim N. Berra [Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1999].

Homeobox Genes, Fossils and the Origin of Species
In this technical paper, the author proposes a new model of evolutionary change to explain the sudden appearance of new species in the fossil record. While others, such as Gould, have proposed periods of rapid evolutionary change, the author explains how more gradual molecular changes might lead to speciation "events" in the fossil record. By J.H. Schwartz [Anatomical Record 257 (1999): 15-31].

Mitochondrial Pseudogenes: Evolution's Misplaced Witnesses
Written for an advanced scientific audience, this paper describes Numts (nuclear copies of mitochondrial DNA), relics of ancient mitochondrial DNA that provide insights about very primitive phylogenies. By Douda Bensasson, De-Xing Zhang, Daniel L. Hartl, and Godfrey M. Hewitt. [Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (2001): 314-321].

Molecular Evolution and Adaptive Radiation
Surveying a tremendously diverse variety of organisms, this text explains how molecularly derived phylogenetic trees offer new perspectives on evolutionary relationships between organisms within a lineage. Edited Thomas J. Givnish and Kenneth J. Systma [New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997].

Molecular Evolution: Evidence for Monophyly of Metazoa
This text, written for an advanced audience, presents recently discovered molecular evidence that indicates that a single protozoan ancestor gave rise to all metazoan animals. Edited by Werner E.G. Muller [New York: Springer Verlag, 1998].

Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution
This book is a valuable treatise on using molecular data as a tool in evolutionary studies, including descriptions of methods. This text also covers evolutionary history and conservation biology. By J.C. Avise [London: Chapman and Hall, 1994].

Patterns in Evolution: The New Molecular View
In this book, Lewin, a science journalist, explains how recently developed molecular techniques have provided a new line of evidence for evolutionary studies. By Roger Lewin [New York: Scientific American Library, 1997].

The Descent of Birds
This article explores the conflicting views of the evolution of birds. While fossils suggest there were two groups of birds during the Cretaceous period and that only one group survived to give rise to modern birds, molecular evidence indicates that all birds descended from the same common ancestor, a survivor of the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. By Carl Zimmer [Discover 16 (1995): 40-42].

The brief history of African Americans in Evolutionary Biology, and why that is the case.

I remember the first day I met a Black faculty member in evolutionary biology. I had just finished my first year of graduate school and was attending the Workshop in Molecular Evolution at Woods Hole biological station. Dr. Scott Edwards, noted ornithologist and member of the National Academy of Sciences, was one of our lecturers for the week. Let me tell you I had never googled someone faster than when I realized he’d be presenting the lecture on phylogeography. Only a few years out from receiving my B.S. in Botany, I found myself thinking, “I could do birds, birds are cool!” Don’t get me wrong, I’ve had plenty of amazing mentors who helped foster my interest and practice of science, and by then had shaken off most of the new-grad-student-smell of indecision. At that moment, though, I was struck. Representation, being able to see yourself in someone else and imagine a possible future, has the power to alter the trajectory of any one person’s life. I enjoyed Dr. Edwards’ lecture and got to have a great conversation with him over the workshop’s celebratory lobster dinner. Still, I ultimately decided I was too much of a plant fanatic to jump ship just then.

What I did take away from that experience was that at some point during my education, I had internalized the idea that the demographics of senior scientists who study evolution were decidedly non-Black, and predominantly White. I’m sure I’m not the only person to have made that assumption. Maybe it was carryover from media stereotypes of the White male naturalist, or the parade of dead White researchers that peppers the history section of any intro-biology course. In either case, I had been unknowingly misinformed, but also not far off. In 2017, the NSF’s survey of researchers in biology found that only 3% of researching biologists identified as Black, despite Black people in the United States making up around 10% of the population. For evolutionary biology, this number is assumed to be even less, to as low as 0.3%.

The article “African Americans in evolutionary science: where we have been, and what’s next,” published in the journal Evolution: Education and Outreach in 2019, discusses the history of this disparity, its potential causes, and the steps necessary as we move toward equity. The article is authored by Dr. Joseph L. Graves Jr, known for his pioneering work on the evolutionary theory of aging, as a long-time champion of diversity, and as the first African American to earn a doctoral degree in the field of Evolutionary Biology in 1988, from Wayne State University. Over a decade after Graves received his degree, only five others would do the same: Scott Edwards in 1992, Tyrone Hays in 1993, Colette St Mary in 1994 (Notably the first African American woman), Paul Turner 1995, and Charles Richardson in 1999 (Above Image). African American researchers had received PhDs in other Biological disciplines, with the first being Zoologist and Anthropologist Alfred O. Coffin in 1889 from Illinois Wesleyan University. Ernest Everett Just, a prominent biologist, trained at Dartmouth University, was well known during the synthesis period for his contributions to embryology, with his book published in 1939 “The Biology of the Cell Surface.” There is some evidence that Just was working on questions surrounding evolutionary problems before his death in 1941, but passed before finishing his manuscript (Manning 1983).

Biologists of the 19th and 20th centuries witnessed and participated in some of our history’s most significant discoveries, though often to the direct detriment of Black and other subjugated peoples of the time. In the United States, many of the first historically white universities were funded with money that came directly from the trans-Atlantic slave trade, often built with slave labor, or were built on land appropriated from Native American tribes. Unrestricted access to the bodies of deceased African Americans, Native Americans, and Irish immigrants fueled the medical development of the time. In some cases, living slave women were tortured and experimented on to develop procedures still practiced today. The natural sciences overall benefited greatly from the destructive effects of European colonialism and the slave trade. In turn, many biologists sought to twist their research to reinforce racist ideals. Biological racism, or racism that supports the validity of biological races and a hierarchy of natural differences, takes root during this time. Theories of race science and eugenics in the early 20th century United States would go on to inspire the slaughter of millions during WWII. That said, evolutionary biology has also been instrumental in picking apart these unfound claims informed by societal biases. Researchers like Theodosius Dobzhansky, Stephen Jay Gould, and Richard Lewontin fought against biological racist ideologies in the field, and Graves counts them as among his primary inspirations.

Though the field experienced a tipping point in the 1990s, there are still several factors contributing to the underrepresentation of African Americans in evolutionary biology. In a survey of motivated students attending the 2013 Annual Biomedical Research Conference for Minority Students (ABRCMS) and the Society for the Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans (SACNAS), the presence of role models in a specific discipline was one of the critical factors in whether students from underrepresented groups (URGs) had an interest in a particular subject. Graves points out that there is virtually no way other than by chance for a student from a URG to know that there are scientists in evolutionary biology that reflect their own experience. Part of this is that there are few Universities with African American faculty members in ecology and evolutionary biology departments. Also, while there are regularly documentaries that cover concepts of evolution and the natural world, there are few that feature African American scientist or their work. Graves himself appeared in the documentary “Race: The Power of an Illusion,” alongside other prominent evolutionary biologists Richard Lewontin, and Stephan Jay Gould. Yet, such films are rarely shown in biology classrooms.

To address this disparity, Graves suggests that as a field, we take an active role. That reliance on “business as usual” will not be enough and that it is necessary to reward faculty who take the extra responsibility of making these goals a reality. Especially as this work often falls to early-career faculty from these groups. Though numbers of African Americans and other scientists from URGs are low, by making an effort to reach out and invite potential candidates to apply, you do a lot more to move the needle forward. Also, when considering the production of outreach materials, we need to make sure to highlight the contributions of scientists from URGs. Yes, this can serve to let students from those groups who are interested in evolution feel represented, but it also affects the overall public image of who does and can do science.

Lastly, Graves emphasizes the importance of evolutionary biology to become an antiracist discipline. While Biological racism isn’t as prominent as it once was, it has since been subverted by Aversive, or colorblind, racism. In this form of racism, the majority race claims that the opportunities and quality of life of the subordinated race(s) are not substantially affected by systemic oppression. This ideology purports the idea that factors, such as the cultural attitudes and practices of racial/ethnic minorities, are the main reasons for their social subordination (Pearson et al. 2009). Aversive racism can be a comfortable place to be. It excuses an individual’s racism (subconscious or otherwise) by suggesting a convenient alternative, like through victim-blaming, despite evidence to the contrary. You don’t have to look very far to have heard of the frustrated anti-diversity statements that are sometimes submitted to search committees. Or to happen across the anonymous twitter accounts of researchers who insist they want to “tell it like it is” as it pertains to researchers from URGs. Combating racism and fostering diversity is extra for any scientist, and often involves taking a stand that can feel political, but I will leave you with some words from Graves that stuck with me: “There is nothing in science that requires that it take a moral stand on any issues, although I would argue that we would be better people and scientists if we did take such stands.”

Graves, J. L. (2019). African Americans in evolutionary science: where we have been, and what’s next. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12(1), 18.

Manning, K. R. (1985). Black Apollo of Science: The Life of Ernest Everett Just. Oxford University Press.

Pearson, A. R., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2009). The Nature of Contemporary Prejudice: Insights from Aversive Racism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(3), 314–338.

Watch the video: Ψευδοεπιστήμη και Αποδείξεις - Μουρούτης vs Θεωρία της Εξέλιξης. Debunking #1 (December 2022).